Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 37
  • 5
    20
  • 4
    11
  • 3
    3
  • 2
    1
  • 1
    2

Type of review

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Good product, I recommend that you try it.

Again. Took off a star for noise. Hum and vibration. You get used to it quickly, but it’s discomfort at a speed of 100+ on the highway, I wouldn’t want it at all, of course, when the road is very long, the head after 4 hours of driving is 80-160 km / h, you climb out into silence and feel this difference . silence and in the head some more residual road noise. Well, this is my feeling and impression. I am ready to endure the rumble for the sake of a quiet ride in a downpour, a hurricane, and…

Pros
  • Gorgeous tires with aquaplaning fierce power! 160km / h in a terrible downpour with a hurricane rushed along the highway into the night (hurried to the state of emergency)! Stayed like in the sea! Not a single release into a rut or winding along the road, it just floats! Season 1 - spring / summer / autumn passed with dignity. Of course, the element of this rubber is damp and very floating flooding weather. She is simply her own among the Chinese oak rubber of the entire flow of citizens.
Cons
  • The first thing I took off a whole star for was the noise. Japanese rubber has always been famous for its noise. My car is additionally expensively all noisy along with the roof, you can’t scream the silence, but imagine if after changing the SHIPS for the summer, I immediately feel the difference and every time I repeat to myself that . go nuts! My spikes are quieter, but here the summer one creates such a rumble! The hum and vibration are serious. I repeat, the new studded tires are quieter! You ride quieter on the railroad tracks! I don't understand how this works. Rubber of medium softness, what you need in Hong Kong. It does not wear off quickly, warms up faster, instead of hard oak rubber or too soft, which is enough for the heat season. As soon as you enter the turns with a bullet, it happens yes, but someone drives, eats up the outer sides (the front part of the edge), well, it just remains a little scratched, without pieces. (I attach the photo) The rest of the tread is not erased with such visibility, everything is smooth.

Auto ff2 was michelin energy, the noise was such that after 800 km my ears hurt, it was decided to make soundproofing, but first change the tires, how pleasantly surprised I was when I put direza 102, the noise disappeared only a quiet pleasant rustle of rubber, I thought the pebbles would clog tread and no, everything is fine, before that I had driving experience for Michelin, Hancock, Matador.

Pros
  • quiet, puddles without problems,
Cons
  • They only have 1000 miles so far so I can't say anything bad.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Great quality, did not expect at all for the price.

When buying a car, they gave a new set of direza 215/55/16, skated more than 20 thousand on it. It is a pleasure to drive on dry asphalt, the noise is only from the oncoming wind. There is a bit of stress after changing asphalt from dry to wet but then the rubber also holds up very well. For the year I caught one nail, but rubber has nothing to do with it. I clocked it up to 240 goes confidently, the car does not lose control. In general, in my opinion a very good rubber, I would buy more.

Pros
  • Quiet and tenacious, handling at altitude
Cons
  • Have not found

Dimension 195/55 R15. Prior car. Drove 200 km on these tires - only positive impressions. Before that, I went to KontiEkoKontakt3, the contacts are an order of magnitude softer, and the dimension was 195/60. What surprised me most about this rubber was the combination of noiselessness and sufficient rigidity, the sidewall is also solid, it drove into good holes - no consequences. It really goes into corners like it's on rails. The only thing I can't say yet is durability. I will write back in…

Pros
  • Excellent directional stability, excellent grip on wet and dry pavement, completely silent, and at the same time moderately tough!
Cons
  • There is none of them

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Reliable purchase, guaranteed to be a good purchase.

For the price of 50k for 4 rinks, it's probably the best option now. Michelin, Continental, etc. will be more expensive. Let's see how long the Danlop will live, Continental, with a fairly moderate ride, lived for 3 seasons, the last 4 season was almost 80-90% worn on slicks. Winter Danlops are somehow not killed by me, they rolled them for three seasons on one car, moved them to another 4 more seasons, the tread was worn out by 20-30%, the spikes were 50-60% in place. But noisy horror, it…

Pros
  • Put after Continental, size R18 245/45. Auto sedan. Wheels brought 21 years. The Continental was definitely softer, these spruces were pulled on the disks, the oak sidewall … I think because of this it keeps the turns fiercely, it doesn’t give a damn about lateral loads. The subjective opinion is that it makes a little less noise than the last rubber (I don’t really remember how the Continental was noisy, but I remember that it was noisy) and objectively less than winter tires with spikes (there is heaven and earth here). There is no feeling that the rubber is oak, the car rides softly. It catches a track, but I think it's because of the width, Continental also caught it. In general, while the flight is normal.
Cons
  • I read somewhere that this rubber does not like changing the coating from dry to wet. That is, if you drive on dry asphalt and drive into a puddle, the rubber goes into a stupor for a couple of seconds and forgets what function it should perform . but it doesn’t if it initially started moving on wet. Until I could test it, I went only on dry roads.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The quality is at the level, I am satisfied with everything.

Before that there were Pirelli Cinturato P1. Soft quiet, but rolling almost like winter tires. dimension 205/55R16. Mazda 6 car. I installed these tires this season. I thought because the sidewall is stiffer and possibly the rubber itself will be noisier. Nothing! At +4 Pirelli is much more plastic and noisier. If you drive on good asphalt, there is almost no noise at all, it depends on the coverage more than on tires. There is no ghoul. On a dry road, turns go with a bang, it is very difficult

Pros
  • Price quality. Quiet, tenacious, excellent behavior at high speeds.
Cons
  • Maybe a little stiffer than regular urban tires, but I didn't really notice. This is noticeable in the stiffer sidewall

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Just super, it's beautifully made, I'm very happy with it.

dimension 225 40 18. Few times fell into the pits and flew into the open hatch at 80-90. The disc was bent, the rack was pierced, the rubber was nothing! Nothing at all. At the tire fitting, they looked and nothing! If you drive in medium parameters (actively, but not to the whistle of rubber), then it's just super. To be honest, it didn't go very well at first. Dubovata appeared. But this is the first rubber that I have worn out evenly with active driving. Speed ​​200-220 is not afraid!

Pros
  • Very durable! No matter how I tried, I couldn't erase like the others.
Cons
  • A bit noisy and yet sluggish in corners and sharp lane changes. Not for racing.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Satisfied with the product, I recommend it to everyone.

Got pros: Used on Hyundai Accent TAGAZ. - Handling, cornering stability (even at high speeds, which is generally good on such a machine!), Holds the road. - Noise level is normal. Doesn't irritate. Has some cons: Note! Very tough. I would say as if the suspension protyunil and clamped. Lovers of comfort will not like it very much.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Average quality, not a great product.

I took a new set of 1-1.5 years, everything was fine, after the car got up for a year, and last summer, when I started driving again, one fine evening, 2 wheels went flat at once in turn at speed! I thought it was a coincidence, it was no longer possible to determine the cause by the flat tires, and later, when I dismantled the remaining 2 wheels, I saw deep cracks from the inside all over the cord! How could this happen?

Cons
  • Mysterious cracks on the inside of the wheel

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am very happy with this purchase, I will advise everyone!

For the money rubber fire. Car Honda Civic EK4, engine B16A2, 160 atmosil, cut-off 8500. Rubber parameters 195/45R16. The motor lives in the red zone. There is enough rubber for two seasons, then I throw the front one back, and on the front a new one and all over again. Wear resistance at the highest level. About grip: if you need to drive stupidly in a straight line, then it is not for you. If you shoot from a place, that is, slipping, when switching from first to second, it can also slip, but

Pros
  • Excellent wear resistance, price, hard sides.
Cons
  • There are no cons for this price tag.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Not my best purchase, you could have found something else.

A long choice of tires led to the purchase of these tires in size 215/50/17, made in Thailand. Winter departure on the new bridgestone blizzak vrx in the same size. After changing shoes, I immediately felt a heavier steering wheel, increased noise and pulling into a rut. Tires are tougher than winter tires. The car began to scour the road with a rut, you won’t relax much. Regarding balancing, two wheels were balanced well (about 15g-20g), two were much worse (about 80g). But at the same time,

Pros
  • Holds the road well, drawing, price
Cons
  • Sensitive to the track, did not like how it was balanced, noisy.

In general, for the money a good option in this size. But it was expected that the wear resistance would still be a little better, especially since 150 drove it only five or six times and at a distance of no more than 100 km . I was pleased with the brake dynamics, very tenacious, if rolled and the asphalt is not worn out. Well balanced, not too heavy for the size. In general, the impression is positive, especially considering that it was taken in 2022 for 2750.

Pros
  • The holder is excellent, it slows down perfectly, it pops up predictably, the price tag at the time of purchase was very pleasing. 215/55 r17
Cons
  • Noisy, throws in a rut, extremely dislikes dirt and sand, for 3 seasons (about 40 thousand km) the tread left about 2 mm .

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Good product, not disappointed.

Chose because of the price / quality, disk protection, availability in networks. Smooth, easily balanced, it is felt that they are heavy, the car has become a little harder to start off, and the pits are rougher, surprised and upset by the wadding of the steering wheel, however, on long trips it can be a plus. It drives confidently along the highway, accelerates to 170, reacts gently to the track, and it’s easy to adjust. Several times flew into very large holes without consequences.

Pros
  • Grip on asphalt, thick sidewall (should be strong), no disc protection, good price and availability in many stores (you can always buy one if you break it)
Cons
  • Noisy, and heavy (hopefully durable), despite the size 195/50/15, the reaction to the steering wheel is very wadded, and the bumps are harsh (after winter tires 175/55/15)

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Wonderful quality, one hundred percent satisfied!

Great tires for your money. They write that it is noisy - on the contrary, everything is fine with me in this regard. With good coverage, you can’t hear the wheels at all - only a blown breeze and a little motor (Kia cerate car). Holds the road, in my opinion, no worse than the Continental, which has been used on different cars for more than 5 years. Moderately tough, what you need. I took it in size 215/50/17 - a great price (5150) for a bottle. Other eminent brands are approaching the price…

Pros
  • Quiet Strong

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I really like the product, it fully meets my expectations.

On tires Dunlop DireZza DZ102 205 / 60R15, I drove a thousand and a few kilometers. Auto KIA RIO III. During this short run, the rubber showed itself only on the good side. Excellent behavior at high speeds. Accelerated to 180 km / h. Good braking and acceleration. It behaves very confidently in corners. Where the regular RIO Kumho was 90, the Dunlop DZ102 can be driven 110… In the rain, there is no hint of aquaplaning. True, water dust is worth a column :-) Rutting passes with a bang. The car

Pros
  • Price, quality, tread pattern, driving characteristics
Cons
  • Not found

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I really like the product, it fully meets my expectations.

I compare with Toyo DRB: acceleration is better, braking is better, taxiing is about the same. If Toyo turned with a sharp pressure on the gas, then such a number does not work with Dunlop. Hydroplaning resistance is the same. The sidewall on Dunlop, subjectively, is stronger, although there was not a single hernia on Toyo for 3 seasons. There is also an aesthetic nuance: Toyo sits beautifully on the disc, the sidewall is even with a slight blockage to the tread, while Dunlop sits slightly…

Pros
  • Excellent directional stability, not afraid of aquaplaning within reasonable limits, acceleration, braking, sharp maneuvers do not cause any problems, I am always sure of traction. Sturdy sidewall. The price is slightly higher than the triangle 968. Adequate weight (about 9 kg) for the size 205/55 R16 and a rigid sidewall.
Cons
  • The tires are quite noisy, especially on the road with a rut and on the old asphalt. But freshly laid - almost silence.