Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 37
  • 5
    27
  • 4
    6
  • 3
    2
  • 2
    0
  • 1
    2

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Perfect product for any user!

After replacing the i5 2500K with the i9 9900K in games, an average increase of 30 frames per second (The Division, GTA V). Not in all, in Resident Evil 2 Remake in general, as it seemed to me, if there is an increase in 3 frames, it’s already good. Video card: GeForce GTX 1080, GDDR5, 8Gb; RAM: 16 Gb both before and after replacement. Changed mat. board, memory and processor. The memory was 16Gb DDR3, I installed 16Gb DDR4 3200MHz G. Skill Trident Z RGB (2x8Gb). i5 2500K overclocked to…

Pros
  • Put i9-9900K, everything flies now. It does not heat up above 75 degrees on a stress test, which loads all cores under 100%. You just need to set the cooling to normal. I have a Noctua NH-D15S.
Cons
  • I don't see any disadvantages. I don’t write the price as a disadvantage, because this is not a lack of processor performance. This is a completely different drawback. Otherwise, it will turn out like on Steam, you watch the game, it has bad reviews, you don’t even feel like buying it, you start reading, and there mom’s dudes, dad’s hard workers write that the game is slag, because it’s expensive. So trust these reviews.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

The product is the most common, it could be worse.

the letter k increases the frequency by default, the overclocking itself is rather conditional . with the new AMD, it’s not an option at all, which is reflected in the cost - with the rise in the dollar, the cost decreases for a month

Pros
  • drives, performance is enough for everything
Cons
  • heats up, overclocking is difficult, it is bad with spreading the load across the cores. the purchase is not for 2022, because it is a direct analogue of 10700k

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The purchase brought only positive emotions.

It's sad that the race with AMD has gone down the path of increasing the number of cores, and not the performance per core. Most of the useful software (engineering programs, databases, browsers, various scripts, user interface, etc.) will not benefit from additional cores. The main gain will be in multi-threaded number grinders, for which the HEDT platform is more suitable, much better optimized for such tasks, incl. having a 4-channel memory bus. Well, we are waiting for the programs to…

Pros
  • 1. Windows 7 runs flawlessly (when used with a discrete graphics card) 2. High single-core performance in complex workloads 3. Durable solder instead of thermal paste under the cover
Cons
  • 1. Official embedded GPU driver for dozens only 2. The processor is very demanding on VRM and cooling 3. It is necessary to manually select the optimal mode of the processor

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The product suited me, I will recommend it to my friends.

Because aliexpress allows confusion in the reviews about processors, I clarify - we are talking about 9900K. Pros: 1) Productive. Faster than my previous 6700K, which I upgraded to make editing and processing 4K video easier in Premiere. Adobe software loves powerful cores, and the 9900K does just fine with that. At the moment, there is simply no better processor in this regard. Accordingly, there is a difference in games. FPS is objectively more. Plus, where the 6700K dropped the frametime…

Pros
  • Performance per core, cache size, multi-threaded performance, factory clocks, memory controller.
Cons
  • Heat dissipation, rapid loss of product relevance.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Excellent product, the best quality.

It's about the i9 9900kf. Mainland ASUS prime b360 plus . Accordingly, in stock. Vidyuha gtx 1080. It copes with all tasks, it is obvious. Dropsy Enermax liq 3. In Aida, after 40 minutes of the test, the hottest core is 68 degrees. I only use it for games. Proca reserve for at least 5 years.

Pros
  • Huge performance Stability
Cons
  • Price

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A very high-quality product, I take it not for the first time.

The Core i9-9900K is currently the only processor for the LGA1151v2 consumer platform that offers users eight cores with support for Hyper-Threading technology. In addition, the Core i9-9900K managed to easily take the place of the most productive mainstream processor, and it is not clear whether something or someone can remove it from this position in the foreseeable future. Cooling : Be quiet! DARK ROCK PRO 4. Overclocking 4.8 MHz, volts 12022 v.

Pros
  • 8 cores, 16 threads. The maximum frequency of two cores from the factory on Turbo Boost reaches 5 GHz, the third level cache is 16 MB, the recommended cooling system is only 95 W in normal mode. Flux-free solder under the heat distribution cover. Z390 logic set.
Cons
  • The Core i9-9900K has very high power consumption and heat dissipation during overclocking.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Everything is fine, I liked the product, I bought it for a reason.

Since switching from the i5-8600K to the i9-9900KF, the following improvements have been made: - Missing microfreezes, which used to annoy literally in all games. - RTX 3080 was able to turn around at full speed in QHD. Previously, in heavy Cyberpunk scenes, the processor was loaded at 100% and the FPS sank to 50. The video card was only 70% loaded. Now the video card is working at full capacity, and FPS only occasionally drops to 70.

Pros
  • A powerful processor capable of meeting the needs of the most voracious games such as Cyberpunk 2077 in 2022. There is even a margin of about 30%.
Cons
  • Gets hot. Although the frequency is 5 GHz, I could not get more than 4.7 GHz from it even with undervolting. Let me explain that we are talking about stable operation at this frequency in stress tests with AVX. After 4.7 GHz, the temperature in stress tests exceeds 90 degrees, which already leads to throttling on my Z390-based motherboard. My cooling is far from top-end, but not cheap either. Medium dropsy. In games, you can probably get a higher frequency, especially if you are lucky in the silicon lottery.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Average quality of the product, especially for the money.

Why did I need him? Immediately I say this processor for people who can throw out 50 tons and forget. Like top and like the most powerful! Darck 4 pro can barely keep up with the cooling! Once grabbed 1% throttling at full CPU load. In short, I'm not happy, I'm just used to intel. My configuration is i9-9900k/RAM 40GB/GTX1080/SSD1000GB/HDD10000 My personal opinion is to mine me nae (deceived). Intel is disappointed

Pros
  • So I took it out of the box and installed it. Everything is working! Performance is good! The increase is felt in games compared to the i7-7700k. That's all.
Cons
  • I combine the pleasant with the useful. I play and heat the apartment. A very versatile solution. Thank you intel you always take care of us.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

High-quality product, the price corresponds to the quality.

Review of Core i9-9900KF Knowing that the stone is very hot, I was not completely sure that the old cooling system (Zalman cnps10x performa + (with an additional 2nd fan) + MX-4 thermal grease) will cope with the cooling of this processor. Therefore, after installing the processor, I decided to limit the TDP in the BIOS and check the temperature indicators in the stress test, and if the above does not help, then turn off Hyper Treading and Turbo Boost before purchasing more powerful cooling. To

Pros
  • Performance (8 cores, 16 threads). Great potential for the future (+ possibility of overclocking).
Cons
  • Heat dissipation.

Revainrating 1 out of 5

A terrible product, not worth your money absolutely!

I decided to upgrade my i7 7700k to this i9, well, well, it should be more powerful, so I thought, all the same, 8 cores, that's all. How disappointed I was, to put it mildly, in this stone. Let me just say, nothing has changed, just money down the drain. What did I want in the end? Yes, I would like some kind of increase in performance, but there is none. Of course, I understand that Intel has a lot of employees, and they need to be paid a salary, but gentlemen, this was a waste of time, don't

Pros
  • where?
Cons
  • the entire i9 series

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A great option for this money, I definitely recommend it!

I have an i9 9900kf performance. I took an i5 8400 to replace it, ated the BIOS of the motherboard before installing it. Works with Arctic liquid freezer II 360 cooling. There are no complaints about the work, in stress tests the temperature does not exceed 76 degrees, at stock frequencies, I don’t see any reason to overclock even in the 21st year, its power is excessive.

Pros
  • Performance.
Cons
  • High cooling requirements.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Everything in the purchase suits, a very necessary product.

The processor is under LSS NZXT Kraken x62 (280mm). I had to add two more 140mm fans for blowing out from the other side of the radiator (they were in stock), as a result, 4 x Corsair LL140, native NZXT from dropsy 2 × 140mm, put down on the cold air intake perpendicular to the radiator, which is located on the front wall of the case, the fans on him for blowing. The video card has its own 240mm dropsy with a radiator on the top shelf with blowing fans. Another 140mm fan for blowing out on the…

Pros
  • Review of i9-9900kf (BOX) 1. Performance. 2. Relatively cold for 8 cores and 16 threads at 14nm. 3. Three years Intel warranty for BOX version I wrote a review on the Amazon website, the whole did not fit. I will duplicate and add. I bought this percentage in September 2022. There is no limit to joy. Used i5-9600k (OS 5.0 6c/6t) for almost two years Platform Z390. I wanted to upgrade . In the case of the z370 / z390, upgrading to a new generation with socket 1200 in the realities of autumn 2022 does not make much sense, and it's too expensive. If you change the current bundle of z390 and i5-9600k processors at that time to a new i7-10700k (8c16t) with a more or less sane motherboard on the Z490, then the costs would be about 50-55 thousand . and if, taking into account the sale of my bundle on the bu market, the cost would be about 35 thousand. Therefore, it was easier and more reasonable to upgrade the processor. I sold the old percentage on the market, added it and bought a new i9-9900kf. The upgrade took about 24 thousand (taking into account the price in Amazon at that time). I didn’t consider AMD, since there are many nuances in terms of selecting motherboards and RAM for stable overclocking, and I didn’t want to bother with overclocking itself. On Intel, in this regard, everything is simple, as discussed below.
Cons
  • The price at the time of purchase (end of September 2022) was ~ 35t.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Perfect purchase for me, exactly what I was looking for!

You need to understand what you are taking. 9900k hot drives itself 4.7 and above. Fire performance. A mother with good cooling should be taken. I have a Z390 aurus master (bios not earlier than F8 stavte) mother fire. This stone is not for everyone - save money and take 8700k or 9700k a little simpler and less show-off but less demanding on the periphery. There is an opportunity to take it - there is no possibility, do not regret it - the stone is excellent, but there are analogues a little…

Pros
  • I9-9900K This topstone is finally soldered. 10 years - no problem It drives itself - put it on and don't touch it, and so it works almost at the maximum. The stone is excellent, but most likely I will never be able to download it 100%
Cons
  • Hot- Requires top air cooler type Noctua NH-D14 (mount from 1150 and 1151 is suitable) or Noctua NH-D15 or dropsy good at least two-section for fans 140. (and during overclocking, noise is natural) Ideally, custom water is needed, but this is already a fantasy)))))))) Price - this is not a disadvantage but a feature Demanding when overclocking to the motherboard ((BPM cooling)) - well, this is logical. Z390 take from 12,000 and more if you want to drive

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A very high-quality product, I take it not for the first time.

Perc is ideal for a powerful, home PC. Mandatory for scalping, preferably with a replacement cover for a custom one, otherwise there is no point in it. The motherboard is at least 15k, the unit is at least 850 watts gold, the memory is at least 3600, respectively, forget about hard drives, at least ssd, but better nvme. Vidyahu younger than 1080 ti also makes no sense to put. In general, this is the top percent, for the top system, period. If you want to save money, this percentage is not for…

Pros
  • Perfectly chases (on the corresponding mothers), the performance is cosmic! After the i5, the 8600k noticed an increase in games, somewhere by 5 frames, somewhere by 7. The system became more responsive.
Cons
  • This is just a hell of a stove, it heats up 100 degrees even with a two-section dropsy, if you don’t have a three-section one, for at least 15k, don’t even think about buying it!

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Not a bad product, quite normal quality.

I’ll say right away that I’m not an overclocker and I don’t understand the buzz in this, so there will be no talk about overclocking, and if you don’t render videos, models, etc. . although AMD’s threader will help you here, then you don’t need this percentage. Just a show off, as in my case. I use a maximum of 50% of its potential. I note that on this process, in principle, you can cook food, or rather, fry something or boil water, the temperatures are fierce, and if you are going to buy it…

Pros
  • Power, power, and more power. What, in principle, can be attributed to the merits of the processor, I don’t know))
Cons
  • Temperatures

Revainrating 5 out of 5

High-quality product, the price corresponds to the quality.

I can't claim to have any expertise on the subject. I am an ordinary consumer without a technical base. I wanted a powerful processor under prof. tasks and games of course, out of habit took Intel. Bought, installed, put water cooling. Dispersed a little. There were no obvious problems, water cooling copes with its heating, but I suspect that the air should not be stunted to cool it.

Pros
  • Habitual Powerful High performance per core Overclocking
Cons
  • Expensive (it's Intel) Possibly hot (I can't assess the problem, I immediately covered it with water)

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A great option for this money, I definitely recommend it!

My copy is stably chasing up to 5.1 GHz, I took 5.3, but CO and mother can no longer cope, and it’s not necessary. While working in stock, 4.7 for all cores. I set it and get high, everywhere the speed is simply cosmic, but advanced CO is already needed for it. In developed countries, the most sold stone, because. if the percent costs less than a week's earnings, then you should take the best one. In our country, they don’t like him, the people simply don’t have money for him, but this is not a

Pros
  • Intel flagship. While the name is common noun.
Cons
  • All obvious, logical. High frequency - heating. Excellence in game/work balance comes at a high cost.