Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 81
  • 5
    47
  • 4
    18
  • 3
    10
  • 2
    3
  • 1
    3

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A great option for this money, I definitely recommend it!

I bought tires in the early summer of 2022, for a Honda CRV. Sizes 235/55/18 are an alternative size, since I didn’t find anything interesting in the state at all. Rubber satisfied to the snot. I didn’t notice much noise on the highway (well, maybe a little, because you have to make allowances for the tread pattern). Since the rubber is sensitively heavier than similar ones, and the alternative size is wider than the standard one, the car is directly poured into the road. The tread pattern is…

Pros
  • Reliable, stable
Cons
  • Probably shouldn't be used in winter.

I bought it because once put on the Grand Vitara, and acquired the skill to drive everywhere without slowing down. It was interesting how jimny would transform a tough agenda, I didn’t count on much, the result definitely exceeded my expectations. Of course, pricing is interesting, 205-70-15 is a little cheaper than 225-70-16, although usually the difference is one and a half times right away

Pros
  • I put it on a jimny-machine not to be recognized. On Hong Kong roads, where asphalt with holes half a wheel from year to year, then in some areas, then in others, it became quite comfortable to ride. On regular breeches from the pits, the wipers sometimes turned on, now everything is soft and comfortable
Cons
  • Well, the payoff for this is the standard noise and plus a liter of consumption. But it's still new. I consider it an excellent compromise for bad, but roads and primers.

I’m riding the second season on a Chevy Niva, I like rubber, I’m not a fan of slowly rolling over the pits, rubber is very good. tolerates well. I didn’t particularly notice planning puddles, it’s also good on a dry road, it doesn’t make noise, it only clicks with pebbles that clogged into the tread. Not all of the pebbles fly out even at speed. I have a French manufacturer, I don’t see wear in two seasons yet.

Pros
  • Soft in moderation, behaves well on wet and dry roads.
Cons
  • The price is the main drawback. And also the fact that the tread is clogged with pebbles and there is a constant clatter when driving.

Left for one season. Satisfied with 100%. The car behaves adequately on any road (asphalt, graphics, country roads). Rear-wheel drive is connected only when the road is really bad :). Aquaplaning? For this rubber, such a concept does not apply at all. at 70 km. H. puddles 3-4 cm deep are generally invisible. With this rubber, you can change shoes for the winter a little later. Now it's -5 outside, and the tires behave like in summer :) although I think it's not worth trying below :)))…

Pros
  • + soft, + aggressive, + excellent road holding (asphalt, gravel), + eats up all the small holes and bumps, + very easy to balance
Cons
  • - a bit noisy.

The general impressions of the rubber are only positive, otherwise I would not buy the same one, but changed all 4 wheels. Some pros: I bought a set of these tires 3 years ago for Suzuki grand Vitara, mainly used 80% city 20% village and primer through the fields in the village. It rows very well in the mud, you can not rush to change shoes with the first snow, it does not tan at zero and a slight minus. Rubber soft enough, moderately quiet. Compared to the regular Bridgestone, some positive…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A great option for this money, one of the best offers.

Pros: Surprisingly quiet! Kolya, such a feeling, she doesn’t care at all)). I haven't noticed any hydroplaning either. Has some cons: Pebbles are hammered into the tread and then, apparently, they fly out over the body or behind the cars going behind .

Revainrating 3 out of 5

In general, everything is not bad, but I expected more.

In principle, good tires, but probably on Cars where there is a good Shumka or frame. I won't buy this for myself anymore. Off-road properties are overrated in my opinion, but it may depend on the Machine of course. Its pros: Durable durable rubber. Not afraid of pits, curbs, stones. Drives on gravel like asphalt. afraid of dirt and sand. drove on wet grass - while the soil under the grass is hard rowing. Only wet ground - look for a tractor))) On asphalt, while the new rides well Cons below…

Some pros: Used this model on Toyota Prado 120 Very comfortable, wear-resistant, the prado steers in them perfectly in any weather, I always drove them to the ice, in general, high-quality tires, I recommend ! With its cons: Minus one, they quickly stick in the mud and, for example, on a wet primer, and even covered with grass, the prado glides like a cow on ice, for example, seemingly bald native Bridgestone, such moments easily pass

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I didn³'t expect the quality to be this good.

For the second season (about 20 thousand km), the wear is insignificant, without punctures, without hernias (the sidewall is strongly reinforced). At the same time, about 80% are ordinary roads, the rest is a dirt road, country roads through the fields and a forest for mushrooms. I took rubber instead of the worn-out regular one for parents on Renault Koleos (2022), I was looking first of all for softer ones (the standard one was hard) and to increase the cross-country ability for muddy roads…

Pros
  • + Soft passes joints, pits, rails and even primer! + For mushrooms in the forest after the rain, now it's not a problem;
Cons
  • - Not for fast city driving

Revainrating 3 out of 5

It's not quite what I expected, overall it's ok.

Has pros: Easily enters the curbs, clings well to the road. It doesn't buzz a lot. The car does not shake, it sits like a glove on the road. Rutting - does not notice. Has some cons: Very rigid sidewall. XL. On average roughnesses - as on a stool! And with a return - like on a ball.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Best price for this product, will buy more!

In one of the posts, someone wrote that there are leaders in the quality of goods on the market and the rest, i. E. Outsiders. And I agree with this, it's like there are German cars, then Japanese and then all the rest, and in tires, of course, I subjectively think this.) As a result, in my head there was such a picture, the leaders of the manufacturers: 1) Bridgestone, Michelin 2) NOKIAN, Yokohama 3) Everyone else. Colleagues, I do not want to offend anyone, I repeat this is my subjective

Pros
  • Rubber, quiet (I even strained my hearing to hear the noise, maybe after the winter there is such a difference, but it was much noisier on the standard all-weather season), soft, does not bounce over the rails and speed bumps, drives comfortably, does not “bang” and does not “spank”, I hope the car suspension will say thank you.))) I am very satisfied, I recommend it to everyone. I have not tried it in the rain yet, but I think everything will be all right.
Cons
  • Didn't find

previously wrote my first impressions of this rubber. now it has been run-in time and road distance, which allows me to convey to you my new impressions. So, a VW Tuareg 2.5 TDI car: - 3700 km. to the sea and back, on various roads (asphalt, broken asphalt, federal highway, mountain serpentine, mountain rocky road, primer) rubber proved to be excellent. the behavior of the car is informative, predictable. Serpentine, speed 20-40 km / h, sharp turns, ups and downs - a clear reaction to the…

Pros
  • strong sidewall, excellent tread, behaves reliably on moderate off-road (I didn’t climb up to my belly in very strong mud)
Cons
  • noisy, dear.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Perfect product for any user!

I have been using it for the third month, I am satisfied with the tires. Its pros: Soft, holds the road well, behaves well during braking, including sharp (on the highway it braked sharply from a speed of 140 km / h - no surprises), looks very good on a car (at least on an SUV), can be used as an all-weather during the first frosts, until snow falls (with moderate minuses, say up to -5, -7,) a tire with a non-directional tread pattern (there is no problem that the spare wheel fits only on one…

I have not tried to ride in winter and I do not advise you. After leaving the mud on the asphalt, keep in mind that this rubber is terribly shot by stones and earth stuck in it, use mudguards Pros: + on pavement - smooth running, excellent braking, remarkably resistant to aquaplaning, quiet for ATs (although compared to many highways they are quite quiet too); very durable (tested by pits in the Kostroma and Kirov regions) + on a grader - they allow you to keep high speed, a very strong…

Got pros: I drive this model for 8-9 years (the third set on the second car), construction sites, the city. In moderation, you can mix dirt, and it does not make noise on the pavement. Its cons: when leaving a dirty area on asphalt, dirt flies out of the tread for a long time.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Im amazed! It was definitely worth the money!

As a result, these tires have more pluses than minuses, I advise you to buy if you are not embarrassed by the minuses, which, alas, but there are. Different pros: Drove 60 thousand km on these tires. and still look like. Wear resistance is very good. Operated only up to -5, and this is already the limit for this rubber, the snow can still endure, but the ice is contraindicated. For all the time, not a single puncture, the previous tires that were from the factory (Kumho) by the end of operation

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Reliable purchase, guaranteed to be a good one.

I use 225/70/16 on the RX-300. Only positive impressions. After Nokia, the difference is like between heaven and earth. On pavement at a speed of 120-160 there is practically no noise. On the grader and the primer is quite adequate response. He walks confidently along a muddy forest path, especially if there is a lot of water - the protector is washed out. In heavy mud, blurring, and as a result, difficulties with handling. From such a kaleya it was thrown onto the rock with the front balloon…

Pros
  • Great, quiet tires
Cons
  • Washing over heavy dirt. Pebbles from the tread fly out with terrible force. But this is also a plus - rubber is almost always without stones in the tread.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Normal quality, you can use it.

My given rubber was M + S (all seasons), it was installed on a panfaider, I used this rubber in winter. It is not suitable for winter! and as summer even very! I use it like summer. as previously said, it holds very well on dry or wet pavement, you can’t hear it at speed, the braking distance on hot asphalt is small, although the machine is not small (2,600 kg in curb weight). Good luck on the road!

Pros
  • Doesn't make noise looks good when you put it on, when you bought it, it looked, to put it mildly, not very good! good grip on dry or wet pavement holds well when entering a turn at speed, both in dry weather and in a downpour !
Cons
  • With no more snow that has fallen, the braking distance is tripled ! rubber does not like snow at all, grip is completely absent ((((and I'm not talking about ice . !

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Best I have ever used, great product for anyone!

Took on Niva 2131. Made in France production. Probably for her, these are too chic tires, but when the handling is already not super, good tires will not hurt. I chose between imported competitors for a very long time, stopped on it and did not regret it. I was especially surprised by the resistance to aquaplaning, that is, I was driving on my NIVA along a dry track, I got the wheel into a deep puddle, and the steering wheel didn’t move.!)))) It enters the turns like it’s on rails! Reaction to…

Pros
  • Incredible properties on wet roads, excellent flotation, impeccable road holding in tight corners, good wear resistance
Cons
  • They probably don't.