Sigma 50mm F1.4 Art DG HSM Lens 📸 for Canon - High-performance and Versatile Lens for Canon Cameras Review

Now I'm not afraid to shoot full-length portraits for fifty dollars, earlier out of 5 takes, miraculously, one was sharper than the rest. I relaxed with Sigma, because hit up to 100%. The color rendition is interesting, it seems that the orange and blue colors are enhanced. The color is dense, the image is more contrasting in itself. On open apertures, strong vignetting is noticeable, but I didn’t write it down as shortcomings, because. sometimes very much on topic. The image is half a stop…

I bought a lens on aliexpress. Scary, of course, but several factors calmed: 1) firstly, a justifiably low price. If we add 18% VAT to it, which we don’t actually pay when ordering in China, then it will be easily comparable with the prices in our stores. 2) secondly, no one will fake the lens, because it's not just trite So do not be afraid of fakes. Mine came in 10 days via SPSR, and the seller did not receive my money until the delivery was confirmed. Plus I saved another 3000 cashback. In

Gorgeous glass, sharp from open, surgically sharp from f2, I didn’t test it in the reportage, it’s ideal for portraits, rare misses happen at 1.4, but here you have to be careful and aim properly, but I really like it. Pros below: Aperture, sharpness, pattern, color reproduction, optical quality Its cons: Weight and price, perhaps for someone, but you need to understand that such an optics plan cannot be light and cheap.

in a certain position, focusing again starts to work, it took 2 months, they returned it, it seems to be working, there have not been any big shootings yet.

Surprisingly sharp at 1.4 The hefty weight is both a plus and a minus, as I expected, Canon 1.4 I' one had a squealing motor, the second had lenses that somehow strongly jumped and shook the camera, giving five stars for my copy.

For a long time I did not know what to choose from 50 When I found out about this lens, View test portraits (in conjunction with 5d2; development in ACR without retouching) here:

Well, Very sharp on open, moderately artistic bokeh, very accurate autofocus - it hits without a miss, which I did not expect from Sigma, even native Canon lenses cannot boast of such accuracy "from the factory" (maybe the fact is that the first batch is quality control more strict) which does not need to be treated, and slight chromatism, gr) also used to heavier glasses, the hood is just right for the topic: it' p=0

Beautiful glass that is sharp from open and has a surgical level of sharpness at f2. The colors are superb. HA on the open is, of course, but there's nothing particularly urgent about it. The autofocus is nice, but I didn't try it for the reportage; it's perfect for portraits; occasionally you'll miss the shot at 1.4, but if you take your time and make sure you're aiming correctly, everything should be fine. The artwork is open to interpretation, but I find it really appealing. Pros: Aperture…

Gorgeous glass, sharp from open, surgically sharp from f2, colors are excellent. HA on the open is of course, but nothing critical. AF is good, I didn’t test it in the reportage, it’s ideal for portraits, rare misses happen at 1.4, but here you have to be careful and aim properly, and everything will be ok. The picture is subjective, but I really like it. Has some pros Aperture, sharpness, pattern, color reproduction, optical quality Some cons: Weight and price, perhaps for someone, but you…

For those for whom the usual fifty dollars is not enough, but it's a pity to spend more than 1000 euros on an elka. Pros: 1) Sharpness - perfect at 5DIII and 6D already at f1.4, good at 5DII 2) No soap, excellent detail (slightly better than 50/1.2L) 3) Fast autofocus 4) Nice colors 5) Nice value (relative to 50/1.2L) 6) Minimum focusing distance 0.4m With its cons. 1) Weight - 850g. too much for 50mm 2) High cost relative to Canon 50 / 1.4 and Sigma 50 / 1.4 3) When shooting people at a

I bought myself this lens choosing from 2x. At 1dm4 in the camera, the correction is +5 and the focus almost never misses. At 6d, it doesn’t even require correction - it will fall into focus anyway. In general, I am more than completely satisfied with the lens ! I took Canon 50 f1.2 for 1 evening - autofocus is slow, the picture was not impressive. With its pros. Sharp at 1.4 I like bokeh (although not everyone likes it) (for these 2 points, I forgive him all the jambs and am ready to put…

I had to buy a USB docking station to set the autofocus to normal operation (without adjustment, the lens missed the target by 10-15 cm when shooting a portrait). but after setting it began to hit exactly the target. I put "5", the purchase is completely satisfied. With its pros. Sharp picture, fast focusing, high detail, beautiful bokeh with even circles. Got cons: When shooting at an open aperture, a very narrow zone of sharpness. The lens is heavy. Over time, you get used to the…

The choice of top-quality 50mm lenses for Canon's full frame is not great. These are Sigma Art 50 1.4 and Canon 50 1.2L. If you take it new, then the prices are 70 and 120 If you take a bu on ebay, then the prices are 50 and 60 In the picture, there is no big revolutionary difference between these glasses, sigma is a little more colorful or something, Canon fascinates at 1.2. But there is a difference in weight. With 5D Mark 2 Sigma weighs 1728 grams, Canon 1506 grams. When the camera already…

Sigma has clearly changed for the better, I don’t consider all the old sigma glasses at all, but after the release of 35mm 1.4 Art, everything has changed, and I am very pleased with the company’s new policy, this lens is for those people for whom the show-off from the red ring of Canon’s native lens is not important series L, this glass is for true connoisseurs and creative personalities, this is a magic glass, I note for adequate money, it will allow you to reach a completely new level in…

The feel of this lens is simply amazing. Very solid, well made. The design and quality of the materials are top notch. Surprisingly sharp at 1.4. There are practically no chromatic aberrations. The hefty weight is both a plus and a minus, depending on your preferences and shooting conditions. Heavyweight, as I expected, it does not feel. There was no opportunity to compare with the Canon 1.2L, Canon 1.4 was left far behind with no options. One of the authors wrote about the super quality of…

I really liked the Sigma AF 50mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Canon EF with its picture, it's an amazing lens, there is no backlash, nothing that happens even in Canon's "L" series. The only trouble is the build quality of individual copies, a real panacea. I bought my copy in Hong Kong. Firstly, because it is much cheaper there than in St. Petersburg, 6-7 thousand. I liked everything, from the box to the lens. Since I was not very experienced, I did not notice the defect immediately (back - front…

I love fifty dollars! I have over 5 of them already. But this lens blew me away! I don't want to take it off the machine. And the longer you use it, the greater the desire to continue shooting with it. I have a Canon 5DMkII. After the purchase, a shift focus was revealed (correction from 0 at close range, to +8 at infinity). I completely solved this problem in 30 minutes using the Sigma USB Dock station. Now everything is always right. Definitely worth your money.

Not a clear lens. On the one hand, it shows excellent results in synthetic tests, has a good picture, and Canon has no alternatives in terms of characteristics at the moment. On the other hand, in real use, working with it gives little pleasure. I strongly advise you to separately think about its weight before buying. It is very similar to 35ku from sigma, but it is easier and therefore more pleasant to work with.

I took this lens in addition to 35ke, as a result, I shoot portrait photo shoots only with it. earlier it was necessary to change and very often optics - now the need for this has almost disappeared. The test results are surprising, or rather the opinion that this lens has no bokeh or pattern - wake up, this lens is all right with both bokeh and volume. I use it often in conjunction with a polarizing filter, I am satisfied with the result. As a universal lens, it met my expectations one hundred

For a canon system, this is the best fifty dollars. (and also for nikon) Sharpness across the entire field of the frame starting from f / 1.4, the optical design differs from the typical planar one, it is she who gives excellent picture quality results, but the bokeh is more like a blur in Photoshop than a drawing. Dimensions can drag most camera models forward.