Sony E 55-210mm F4.5-6.3 OSS Lens for Sony E-Mount Cameras: A Versatile Silver Lens for Superior Performance Review

There was a 16-50 mm lens in the kit, so it washed so that the photos from the phone were clearer, I sold it. According to some reviews, these lenses seem to be sharp. And the Sony 55-210mm impressed. I don’t complain about aperture ratio, in the evenings on the street with even hands you can take decent photos. Holds backlight well. Autofocus is normal . There are also Sigma 16 mm 1.4f + 60 mm 2.8f fixes so that you don’t think that there is nothing to compare with.

I use it with a5100 as the main one when traveling - I love the details. Compared with the ancient fix Minolta Tele-Rokkor-QF 200mm F / 3.5 - on average, no worse, only more versatile, although manual focus, color reproduction and aperture ratio do not allow you to get rid of this heavy monster completely. : a lot has passed since then: this lens was bitten by a toothy dog ​​(surprisingly survived, only the manual focus began to stick), and I got a new SEL18135 - and in comparison with it, I…

Diving into my product impressions.Everyone should have a TV set - that' you can take 55-210, because other options will already be 2 is 10 times more expensive.

Sharing my experience with it.Got pros: Inexpensive, Stunningly assembled, no backlash, no creaks, Got cons: I would call it a compromise - aperture ratio (dark).

It was purchased just a month ago, I have no problems with autofocus (Sony a6000 camera), the lens can be considered the best zoom under the E mount for the money (purchased sold for 6490r)

In principle, I am satisfied with the lens - the photos are excellent, because I'm an amateur) The only thing I'm not satisfied with is the AF operation - it' I will not say for sure - perhaps it should be so, but perhaps not.

Has some pros: Cool design, metal body, excellent stabilizer! Its cons: Very picky about the light, AF starts to fail already in cloudy weather!

Got advantages: a great lens for shooting big things. Complete with a standard out of the box fit is ideal for a beginner. Flowers, animals, and portraits are all ideal. negatives: I use it as my primary. A specialist might spot faults. I've just started, so I haven't noticed.

The visual quality is extremely respectable, and it is comfortable, light, and attractive. Con: It is really dark. Autofocus that is painfully slow and occasionally jerky for roughly three seconds. In photographs with high contrast, chromatic aberrations become more obvious as the zoom level is increased to its maximum.

Has pros: Lightweight, fits comfortably in the hand, looks great on the carcass, good focal lengths. Some cons: Strongly lathers along the edge of the frame, strongly pronounced vignette.

All in all, a perfectly ordinary but well-built telephoto lens with very good value for money. Of course, under Sony E there are much more expensive, fancy, high-aperture and pin-cut models, but most inexperienced users will not see any fundamental differences from the modest 55-210. Has pros: * High-quality, as with most Sony lenses, constructive. The lens feels like a nice, moderately heavy beer can. * Sharpness is beyond praise, while the picture is beautiful and natural, without "ringing…

It was purchased just a month ago, in order to shoot objects remotely. It copes with its work with a bang, I have no problems with autofocus (Sony a6000 camera), everything is in order in any lighting. In general, the lens can be considered the best zoom under the E mount for the money (purchased sold for 6490r) Some pros: - High quality construction - Good picture - Pretty harsh - Compact enough for such a zoom Has cons: - Unless the lens hood is easily scratched, but this is a nitpick and…

2022 - still relevant! I use it for travel and it's indispensable. And with such a price, it’s not scary to lose) For 3 years of active trips, I haven’t collected dust / sand in myself, despite the outgoing trunk. If you have little money and want a zoom - feel free to take this lens, you will not regret it. Has some pros In terms of quality - more than your money! By day it is a star and will give you great shots. OSS - stabilization works out perfectly. You can shoot adequate video on the…

The only cropped telezoom in the E system pleased with the standard picture quality in all modes, low price, and low weight. For the money it works as it should, no more, no less. For lack of a better one, a necessary addition to 16-50mm Its pros: 1) High sharpness at all focal lengths with a cover of one or two stops 2) Clarity, accuracy, technical-surgical Sonev picture 3) Stylish design, build quality 4) Excellent contrast and work in hard backlight 5) Very low price in the secondary market…

An interesting and necessary lens in the system, and not only for shooting distant objects. It is necessary for traveling as a second lens, tested in Sevastopol. But if you need a quick reaction - not the case. I took for 7400 scattered, without a box. This is an absolutely adequate price for him, the flight is normal, there was no dust either inside or outside. Different pros: Well built, a pleasure to work with. Compact for such a focal length, lightweight. At a large focal length, shooting a

This lens was purchased for the Sony ILCE-QX1 smartograph, as a telephoto lens, to the company by 16-50 and 55F18 to close the focal lengths above 50mm. I took it from my hands for 6tr. I don't use it very often, because the QX1 becomes very bulky with it, but it helped me out a few times when it was not possible to get closer. Compared it with Canon EF-M 55-200, Canon EF-S 55-250, Canon EF 70-200 F4 + x1.4 and Tokina 80-400, Tamron 28-300 VC. (The choice of lenses is because I have them in…