The A7 is technically good, but its ergonomics is inferior to the NEX-5T(R) and even more so the A6000, it feels something like this. Therefore, having changed it to the A6000, I do not regret anything, everything is fine here. And you shouldn’t worry too much about FullFrame, FF Sony and FF Canon are still different things. Its pros: Very nice camera with excellent auto and manual focus. The descent, compared to the A7, is short and clear The wheels spin much nicer than on the A7 Menu…

I recently purchased this unit and a portrait lens for it. For a long time I wanted to take photography more seriously, and yet I managed to allocate money for this. After buying the camera, I immediately noticed how fast it is! Everything from my youngest child to the skaters I accidentally caught my eye turned out to be extremely sharp. And this despite the fact that I shot these things in burst mode. With no other camera I have even come close to doing this! It also shoots well indoors…

All good. and what is listed above, and the cons are not very critical. after large bags with optics for a DSLR, I can get by with an ordinary small one and carry everything with me. The arm and shoulder do not hurt at the end of the day. It is a pleasure to send photos to the editor of the publication on the go. Thanks Sony. from a grateful Journalist. ;-)) Different pros: + image quality in both RAW and JPEG + rate of fire (not very important, but it's nice that you can) + availability

Different pros: The Sony Alpha A6000 was purchased for reasons of travel convenience: light weight (about 350g) and small dimensions made it easy to transport and quickly use the camera. Compared to the old DSLR (D90), for which a separate photo backpack was allocated, for me this was an important selection criterion. In ergonomics, I liked the presence of a control wheel, it is easy and convenient to navigate through the captured photos / videos, and control frame correction during shooting.

I bought this camera to replace my soap dish. I was considering a DSLR, but when they showed me this camera, I fell in love with it. And I am very glad that the first impression of this camera did not let me down. The photos are very high quality and professional. I am very satisfied with the purchase. With its pros. Lightweight, compact camera with incredibly high-quality autofocus and excellent photo and video quality. Cons: Not a very cheap camera, but as always, you have to pay for quality.

I recently purchased a camera . with two whale lenses . For a week of use, I did not find any shortcomings, except for those indicated above . but they have nothing to do with the camera . A worthy replacement for any cropped DSLR . Its pros: A compact camera with fast autofocus and not bad optics in a kit version. I am pleased with the quality of the noise at the upper ISO . Full HD video is also at the level . With its cons. Lack of proper instructions. Perhaps, as experience is gained, the…

Feels weightless after the Sony A55, while shooting better and focusing faster. For the ideal, it remains to add a touch screen and a GPS receiver. Got pros: Great photos and videos! Lightweight and compact Fast and tenacious autofocus High operating ISO Fast screen refresh even in low light Sufficiently durable battery that is charged directly in the camera with a charger from any smartphone with micro-USB Conveniently done disk management Cons below: While charging, it does not allow…

I bought the camera 2.5 years ago, during this time I did not use it very much - I took about 4000 pictures. At a fine moment, when photographing, it gave an error - Camera error. Turn the power off and on again. Didn't drop, didn't drown, didn't hit. Looks like new. In the workshops they say that the problem is with the shutter. Warranty expired, repair for money. In my opinion, the quality is disgusting.

I bought this camera a week ago. I want to say the following: the time for DSLRs is a thing of the past! I compared the photo quality with canon 70d SLR cameras. I was very surprised when I saw the result from canon and from Sonya, just heaven and earth. 70d in detail and colors, and this is at such sizes!) As for the focus, a surprise awaited me here too. The vaunted focus on 70d feels inferior to Sony in speed. So I can say one thing, the sony a6000 is a very strong model and, most…

after the birth of a child, the task arose to buy a camera. The choice was between fujifilm xt10 and sony a6000, I didn’t even consider the mirror, because this is already the last century and now it makes no sense to buy these ancient cameras. there is almost none there, also the video is not of the best quality, and this was also important for me, because I shoot about 50/50 (photo / video). Therefore, without thinking twice, I opted for the A6000 and did not regret it. Model I am completely…

I will leave a review as a person who does not understand the characteristics, but has good experience. This device became a friend of our family more than 5 years ago on the recommendation of friends and experienced important moments in life with us. We bought it on favorable terms, so we are definitely satisfied with the purchase to this day! Pros below: 1) Definitely in the first place physical characteristics - convenient, compact, stylish. Those people who see the camera for the first…

Excellent camera: suitable for both amateurs and advanced users. Highly recommend! Has some pros 1. It is very compact, fits in a jacket pocket, handbag - no need to take a big uncomfortable bag, as for a DSLR. And if you still decide to take a case for it, there is a native Sony LCS-EJA leather case for sale. 2. Easy! One and a half times lighter than, for example, Nikon D5300. Great camera for travel - always with you and does not stretch your neck :)) 3. The shape of the camera is…

after this device, I’m unlikely to transfer to the mirror, because it’s already yesterday, just not everyone understood. if I change, then only for a7 ii / a7r ii / a7s. for the money (especially for those who shoot videos) I don’t see a better choice. with the recent firmware 2.0 added the xavc-s codec and also reduced the turn-on time of the camera. Pros below: 1) price-quality-functionality ratio. the nearest competitor canon 7d mark ii is SIGNIFICANTLY more expensive. cheaper canon and…

In general, the camera is worthy, I bought a couple of batteries and adapters, it’s a pleasure to use with manual optics, my native 50 1.8 is increasingly lying idle, and manual samyangs are on the camera. Pros below: Great camera, fast, well built, incredibly comfortable to use manual lenses. helps to take great pictures that are not inferior to pictures from SLR cameras. I took only her and a few lenses on vacation, the bag is several times smaller, but I did not lose the quality. Has some…

What was needed from the camera was perfectly working automatic mode and scenes. He dealt with it. Buying a lens of a higher level is not even in my thoughts. At least until the next sale =) Its pros: + Photo quality with the included 16-50 lens + Build quality (9/2022 batch) + Design + Comfortable in the hand + Non touch screen + Price 19,000 (According to the promotion -50% for everything if he was dressed in red) Some cons: - The complete lens sometimes produces noise. Fans of looking…

In my opinion - the best option for this price on the market! I have been using it for 2 years now and as my experience and knowledge in photography grows, my respect for the A6000 is growing. I got it with two whale lenses, but they are gathering dust - I shoot everything for fifty dollars Sony f1,8. As the passion for photography turned into a commercial activity, there were vague doubts that you would still have to change to Full Frame, but now all doubts have fallen off, because all its…

Over time, I replaced the whale 16-50 with Zeiss 16-70, the color rendition improved significantly, a small gain appeared in detail, but at the same time it lost its compactness in finance)) In general, an excellent inexpensive device, I don’t see the point in changing to 6300 and even more so 6500. Pros below: Color rendition. Excellent basic sensitivity of 100, 200 is also not bad, further on for an amateur. Small size and weight. The case is no frills but quite well assembled, no complaints.

If you close your eyes to some shortcomings (in principle, solvable), then this camera is a great alternative to outdated DSLRs! Has pros: Pros: Great photos and videos Lightweight and compact! Fast and tenacious autofocus Panorama function with auto-melting There is wi-fi: you can throw photos directly on your smartphone Charged via USB from phone charger Convenient control in dignity Has cons: limitations : While charging, it does not allow you to do anything: neither take pictures, nor even…

They were supposed to be new but they were printed. If it works because the battery is dead, which is not normal with a new product, I'll know a star tomorrow, that's all for now until I know more

The camera is excellent. The low weight ensures great shots. Everything a mirrorless camera should be. Works great in low light. This camera was supposedly factory refurbished, I don't think so. I think it was just a return they repackaged. My camera didn't have a lens cap and just didn't look renovated. As I said, the camera worked well.