I tried out three different lenses while I was in the shop. One of them had a front focus, and the other two ended up being really good overall. A very good lens for the price of 16,000, which is the price of the version without image stabilization. For 22022 rub. Since the absence of a stub is not at all important at focal lengths ranging from 17-50 millimeters, I do not believe that it is reasonable to purchase a version that includes an image stabilizer. It sounds more like a tactic that Tamron would use for marketing. You could purchase a Tokina AT-X 165 f/2.8 Pro DX for the same amount of money. It is optically no better than the Tamron SP AF 17-50mm f/2.8, and in certain places it is even less crisp when the aperture is wide open, but it has a pleasing "plastic" picture and a superb branded metal construction, which makes it liquid in the secondary market. Unlike Tamron, which, after a couple of years of operation, can only be sold for a penny when it's put up for sale. In a nutshell, it was not an honor for me to purchase this lens.
Wasserstein Floodlight Charger and Mount for Blink Outdoor & Blink XT2/XT Camera - Transform Your Blink Camera with a Versatile Floodlight (Black) – Blink Camera NOT Included
3 Review
Sigma 150-600mm f/5-6.3 Contemporary Lens for Nikon DSLR Cameras - USB Dock, Backpack, Monopod, SD Cards & More - 8 Accessories Bundle
3 Review
Kodak 4PASS Cartridge Ribbon Refill
3 Review
📸 Camera Accessory Kit for GoPro Hero9/Hero8/Hero7, GoPro Max, GoPro Fusion, Insta360, DJI Osmo Action, AKASO, APEMAN, Campark, SJCAM - Black
3 Review