I bought it a few months ago specifically for a future vacation, and ofcomurse I immediately began to actively shoot. Examples of photos in my album what can I say after use. His sharpness is quite "soft" whencompared with 70-200, then none at all. Elka is sharp even sometimes too much. But this one is more "feminine" or something. You don't have to work as hard on the skin, which is definitely a plus. Quite decently draws a person in height and to the waist. Larger angles, which is naturally not for him. At first there was a feeling that I wasted money in vain, but after I got used to it a little, I changed my mind. Just at first it was unusual to work at such a focal length. Landscapes, for which you actually took it, you can see here ?. I took it for this too. My advice is to buy a "polar" and a "medium gray" filter for it, which I actually did, and then you will get the maximum result. In my landscape album, everything is shot with a polarizing filter. Not bad for reporting. On mine, there seems to be a small back focus (+5). It doesn't matter, Icomrrected it on the carc and that's it. In a word, a normal lens. For me, it fully met my expectations. I like 70-200 more, but this one is a must-have. When there is not enough space, a wide angle helps a lot, and in the dark, it also has excellent performance (I tried it at 1600 and did not disappoint). In short, my advice is to take it.
Black Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS II USM Lens - Model 1380C002
78 Review
Nikon 50mm f/1.8D Lens: Perfect for Nikon DSLR Cameras!
97 Review
π· Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 50mm f/1.4G Lens with Auto Focus: Perfect for Nikon DSLR Cameras
76 Review
Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM Lens - Fixed Black (6310B002) for US Cameras
76 Review