Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 93
  • 5
    56
  • 4
    22
  • 3
    8
  • 2
    4
  • 1
    3

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A wonderful product, its nice to use.

The most inexpensive and the best, if you have a carcass + a limited budget and you hesitate with the choice - halibut 1.8 is what you need. Some write that the hole 1.8 2 2.2 is non-working, I don’t know, I used it on 1000D, 50D and 7D, I have all the workers and 1.8 too, the depth of field on this hole is minimal, so you need to remove it very carefully, with iron hands )) and the subject should freeze, well, in principle, this rule works for any glass. So if you take FotikKit, then the best…

Pros
  • Inexpensive, for the money you will not find better. Sharp and fast (although it would be necessary to choose if there is something, they differ from each other in sharpness).
Cons
  • narrow on the crop, well, most likely this is not a drawback, this is a property of a fix. Of course, in a small room, do not accelerate, you will have to make close-ups. but the result of the quality of these plans / portraits will please you.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Nice product, happy with my purchase and may buy again.

I bought this lens to replace the whale lens and never regretted it . moreover, I had the opportunity to compare it with the Canon EF-S 17-85 f / 4-5.6 IS USM, which costs 2,5 times more and I liked the fifty dollars much more. In my opinion, for a beginner, this lens is the most it. Works out his money for all 200%. Perhaps someone will say that it is not so sharp, that the bokeh is plastic, that they say it is made of plastic and therefore it can break when dropped. Firstly, it's not as…

Pros
  • Price and Aperture - the most important advantages.
Cons
  • Small viewing angle on the crop, not always sharp

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Impressions from the purchase are good, buy.

Definitely take. Don't be afraid to make mistakes. For a month you will squeak with delight and play with depth of field. Then decide for yourself - either leave it resigned to the shortcomings, or very easily and quickly sell the BU and buy 1.4, which is already a lot more fun in all respects. All jambs with front / back focus will pop up on an open hole if they are in the carcass. You will have to do the adjustment, which, as it turned out, is quite easy to do yourself without servicemen.

Pros
  • Very cheap, light, light, liquid in case of buying and selling bu.
Cons
  • Flimsy, slow, not sharp enough, don't count on autofocus to work in poor light.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Fits the description completely, very satisfying.

The lens caught with a strong front focus. I managed to fix this by soldering the jumpers inside. For those who are interested, look for the "EF 50mm F/1.8 II Self-Adjustment Guide". Focus misses much less frequently now. I shoot mostly at aperture 2.2-4.0. I advise everyone to understand what a fix with a constant aperture is. Now I would buy a Canon EF 50 f / 1.4 USM. I use it on crop (550D).

Pros
  • Price, aperture, beautiful bokeh after the 18-55 whale lens.
Cons
  • Frequent autofocus misses, plastic construction.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Everything about the product satisfied me, the price is perfect.

Thinking out loud like an aspiring amateur photographer on a budget. 1. imho this lens is a must-buy for all beginners in the world of photography (which I myself am). Very affordable price for such a fast lens. Unlike the 18-55 kit zoom, this 50/1.8 fix really makes the photographer think. True, with him sometimes you have to run around the subject, choosing the right angle and distance. But that's just the beauty of it. With him, I mastered and experienced depth of field in practice at…

Pros
  • Price. Aperture.
Cons
  • Inaccurate autofocus (but for such a price is excusable).

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Everything about the purchase suits me, a very necessary product.

Unless it will be a disadvantage for those who want to capture as much as possible in the frame, perhaps the entire wall in the apartment - it will not work. You need a wide angle. And this lens is purely portrait, autofocus is also focused not on the full frame, but only on the object that is closest. It is possible that in the museum, standing next to the exhibit, you will not be able to make the exhibit clear, it will be soaped up like a background. You will have to choose one of the two…

Pros
  • An excellent portrait lens, the background lathers very beautifully, in the creative shooting mode it exceeded all expectations! Cool lens for the money!

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Normal quality, you can use it.

After living for 2 years, the lens rested in the Bose :( It fell apart from a fall from a height of 15-20 cm onto a soft carpet. This proved that its fragility was not accidental and it cannot end in anything good. In general, I was not satisfied with the lens, because. quite often he smeared with auto-focus. Later, autofocus stopped working - the mechanism just got stuck. Because I can’t imagine myself without a fix for 50, then I’ll have to buy a new one. In this case, the proverb that a…

Pros
  • Price
Cons
  • § Constructive § Auto-focus errors

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I do not cease to rejoice at the purchase, a very good deal!

Read a lot of comments here. I agree with many, which is why I bought this lens for myself. It blurs the background just fine. They can achieve the expression of their ideas by focusing sharpness on a particular area by focusing exactly on this point with a fully open aperture. With a slightly covered aperture, an excellent portrait is obtained (for which it was bought). The Canon EOS 60D catches focus perfectly even in poor lighting. It is ALWAYS aimed at the central point, without errors. If…

Pros
  • Not big, light, not expensive! Sharp, light, pleasant.
Cons
  • There is no depth of field scale. Small stroke of the sharpening ring.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I recommend to buy, the product is of high quality.

For about a year I shot on this glass (now I changed it to f1.4, about which I also wrote my review). The picture at the output, given its cost, you can safely put a solid 5-ku. Pleasant bokeh, excellent aperture. Of course, the price is due to the use of cheap plastic, the average quality of the lens assembly as a whole, the "diesel" focusing motor (the sound sometimes frightens him, especially in silence). Focusing is also a problem in some places. As soon as you bought it, immediately bring

Pros
  • Of course the price; image sharpness; luminosity; the weight (?)
Cons
  • Flimsy construction; cheap plastic, focus motor

Revainrating 1 out of 5

Disappointed with the product, not good for anything.

Soap lens with overshooting autofocus. On open apertures 1.8 - 2.4 misses, the pictures are not sharp. 1 shot out of 10 will turn out more or less, and then if you're lucky. One advantage - on the “crop” it turns into a “portrait”, with a focal length of 80 mm. And with an aperture of 1.8 - 2.4, it creates the blurry background (bokeh) that is so significant for most photographers. But along with the bokeh, the portrait itself is not sharp. Moreover, the central autofocus point can be aimed…

Pros
  • Price. bokeh.
Cons
  • Autofocus misses. Soapy, not harsh. Front / back focus on many instances. Design.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The item is of good quality, there is only one minor defect.

A lens for specific purposes. If when purchasing a thing you don’t get what you expected, then these are not flaws. Another thing is if it does not correspond to the manufacturer's statements or some features are simply hushed up, but this has not yet been found in this lens, I have not conducted any special tests, except for the focus. They write about noise - it doesn’t bother me personally at all, I don’t do espionage - I don’t have to hide in the bushes. They write about fragility - yes…

Pros
  • 1. Price. 2. The picture is better than the whale EF-S 18-55 f / 3.5-5.6 IS 3. The lack of a stabilizer is compensated by a large aperture. 4. Small size and weight. Fits perfectly in your pocket as a spare.
Cons
  • See comment.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am amazed at how well the product is made, just magically!

Let me start off by saying that I am not a pro, but a beginner amateur. the lens was bought as a supplement to the donated whale D1000. I really liked the portrait shots, I just didn’t expect that for such money you can open up the possibilities of the camera in a new way . In the automatic settings mode, the pictures are indistinguishable from the "native whale" lens. The lack of zoom does not bother me much, but this "flaw" completely overlaps portrait shots

Pros
  • Cost, weight, workmanship, excellent portrait shots in good light, fully justifies the expectations of the money spent on it.
Cons
  • I have not yet been able to get decent shots in low light conditions, zoom with my feet :-)

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Some kind of defective product, I definitely wont buy it anymore.

After the native 18-55 whale lens with a stabilizer, this one is perceived as cheap trash. I bought into the description (everywhere is about the same) "indispensable for shooting portraits" - I didn’t find anything indispensable in it, I didn’t get anything fundamentally new in the quality of the pictures, in comparison with the whale lens. On a whale, it’s personally more convenient for me to shoot in TV mode, but on this one it turned out to be on Av, that’s the whole difference. I think…

Pros
  • Didn't find it.
Cons
  • Autofocus buzzes too loudly, the lens twitches from it (something like recoil), some kind of internal backlash is felt, it is possible to fix the focus with half pressing once (this is not the case with the whale), focusing misses 4 times out of 5, it is more reliable to focus with your hands, but inconvenient, the manual focus ring is located at the far end of the lens and the lens hood interferes with your fingers.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I am satisfied with everything, both price and quality, I advise you to buy.

A very good entry-level prime lens. More than a year has passed since the purchase and I have never regretted that I bought it. After leaving the store, I immediately noticed that now a lot of surrounding objects do not fall into the frame and now I have to work more with my feet. But you quickly get used to it. If there is a feeling that the lens included in the kit is no longer enough, then I believe that this model is an obligatory step towards the formation of a list of lenses that you…

Pros
  • 1. Aperture. Compared to whales Allows you to shoot at dusk and indoors (indoors, you should take into account the focal length, in a standard apartment it is quite problematic to shoot a person in full growth at 50mm, and even a crop matrix, but portraits with a bang). 2. Sharpness. I think that entry-level zoom lenses are not capable of providing such sharpness (I don’t consider L). 3. Low chromatic aberration even wide open. Before buying 85 1.8, I did not even know about them. 4. Price ~3500. This is one of Canon's legends for price and quality. 5. The lens is recessed deep enough, it is harder to smear it.
Cons
  • 1. Flimsy construct (the material of the body and bayonet is plastic), but if you don’t drop it, it will last a very, very long time. 2. Lack of in-body focusing (hobod moves out when focusing) compared to 85 1/8. 3. Frequent misses of focus (it is worth taking more of the same shots) 4. The housing has enough slots for dust to enter. 5. Inconvenient manual focus ring (located on the very edge of the lens, it is not convenient to use it with a hood). 6. Many people complain about bolt-shaped bokeh due to the small number of aperture blades, but for a novice photographer, this does not matter.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Not my best purchase, could have found something else.

So I'm ripe for a review, what can I say, I regretted buying it, it's not for me. During the next photo session with a child on the street, I had to periodically put on whale lenses - 50 is a lot for shooting a large picture in the vicinity, periodically I had to move ten, fifteen meters away to shoot, for example, a child on a BTER or near a gun, otherwise not everything is included. At a strong distance, the lens begins to soap, quality is lost. This lens is purely portrait and macro-came…

Pros
  • Aperture
Cons
  • plastic case, no stub, price.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The quality is top notch and I recommend the product for purchase.

After I bought myself a 50 / 1.8, I practically stopped shooting on a whale 18-55 IS. I take almost all the pictures (95 percent, if not more) for fifty dollars, despite the fact that I always carry a whale lens with me just in case. I sometimes use a kit only where a wide end or a stub is needed (this is a video and manual focus). I will only note that 50 / 1.8 requires some care when autofocus is working - at an open aperture, the depth of field becomes very small and, therefore, the…

Pros
  • Excellent aperture, price, sharpness, compactness
Cons
  • Relatively long end on crop, no stub, small number of aperture blades

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I didn't expect the quality to be so high.

Classic halftone. The cheapest fast fix, which does not affect its quality. Hole 1.8 is not always working, more precisely, as AF hits, from 2.2, the workers are completely. 9-point AF should be used carefully, preferably at the midpoint. The shortcomings described are more than covered by the image quality, excellent background blur, focus accuracy, and sharpness. must have. Requires careful handling, flimsy construct. If you manage to find the first version - tear with your hands. The…

Pros
  • Price The weight Result
Cons
  • Constructive

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best thing for the money, I'm glad I chose this option.

My copy is a front focus master. That is, he always focused in front of the subject. I have a 7D and I adjusted it manually (according to the photo target), now everything is fine. The lens began to give a sharp picture even at f / 1.8. The color rendition of the lens is 3 out of 5. Very fast - and this is a class! To use it with a protective hood is to catch hares . And why, the lens is cheap .

Pros
  • Low price, aperture ratio, light weight
Cons
  • Cannot zoom in/out: fixed. 50mm is too much on the crop.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The perfect purchase for me, exactly what I was looking for!

In general, I'm happy with it, because I generally have a scourge kit)) 1100D SLR and this lens) it's not cheaper to find. I'm not a photographer and I don't even call myself a beginner. I photograph purely for my pleasure. And this lens is quite suitable for the same lover to take pictures of his dog, food and child)) But I also think that a professional can take normal photos with this lens. Although 1.4 50mm seems to be more stable, it is also 4 times more expensive. The main disadvantage in

Pros
  • -definitely PRICE! that overshadows all imperfections)
Cons
  • -there is no desired sharpness when the aperture is open wider than 2.8 -frequently out-of-focus shots, according to my observations, there are 3 photos without focus, the next 10 with focus. I read that this problem is not common at all. - flimsy - focuses loudly, but these are trifles IMHO

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The ratio of price and quality is very pleasing, I will repeat the purchase.

Beginners are required to buy) I think that for such a price - just a gift from canon. For those who have not enough whale, I highly recommend taking exactly 50 1.8. This is an opportunity to feel what a fix is, what aperture is, what a normal portrait is. The lens is a portrait lens, because. on crop it will be about 85 mm, and it is unlikely that anyone will take exactly 1.8 for a full matrix) In this regard, it is narrow. In rooms, especially in apartments, it is constantly crowded, this is

Pros
  • Sharp enough. Bokeh is generally pleasant. 1.8. Very light. Cheap.
Cons
  • Soaps on an open hole. Not as tightly packed as more expensive models. Aperture of five petals.