Car tires Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 215/50 R17 91H Review

Size 225/65/17. Car Toyota RAV 4. First impressions of operation. The car turned into a "jelly". Barely rolling, wild rolling resistance. Ratings and reviews for the most part are clearly cheated. Wasted 48 thousand. I bought it under the impression of the winter "ice contact 2", the best winter tire I have ever used.

I put it on Rav 4 instead of regular Bridges. The difference was felt immediately. Good grip on wet and dry pavement. Confident maneuvers at any speed and weather conditions. They performed well on gravel. Very quiet and comfortable tires. Would recommend to anyone looking for a versatile tire for small crossovers.

Because of the unpleasant sensation that results from even a slight increase in speed when the vehicle is negotiating a turn or approaching an exit, fast driving is not recommended. Got pros: I traveled 55,000 kilometers on wet roads and found the stability to be good. Since there is no sign of significant deterioration, I estimate that another 25,000 to 30,000 kilometers will be traveled. Below are some downsides: Weak sidewall if anything sharp sharp sidewall hooks breaks like paper

Excellent tires! Because of the city and the poor quality of the roads, it's the most. Naturally, the H/T bridge is going to be the superior option for the "German autobahns." Got pros: Very low noise levels, exceptional softness and comfort, and overall compatibility with aquaplaning. You go - you relax! Having these drawbacks: At speeds more than 100 miles per hour (160 kilometers per hour), some discomfort. Additionally, the track is not in her wheelhouse.

put in the amount of 205/80 16C on the rear axle, on the gazelle next diesel 17g. first surprised consumption with trailer 22l/100km, after about 3t. Km consumption 18l. now 15.5 with a trailer. rubber is quiet and soft

If the speed is a little more in a turn or at the exit, it pulls off even abruptly, the feeling is not pleasant, so not for fast driving With its pros: Wet road stability is good, drove 55,000 km. strong wear is not visible, I think another 25-30000 km will pass Cons below: Weak sidewall if something sharp sharp sidewall hooks breaks like paper

The impression left after using the old tires is just outstanding, and I took it with the knowledge that I would be traveling on a dirt road and entering a forest later on. The tire delivered a ride that was as smooth as could be expected and had remarkable road holding capabilities.

Because of my extensive driving experience, I decided to make my first purchase from this manufacturer of tires. In the past, I have tried tires from a variety of brands and models, but without sounding boastful, I can say that this is the best tire that keeps the road with a bang, there is almost no noise, and in a nutshell, the rubber is well worth the price. Take it, you won't regret it.

Chose between Michelin / Nokia / Conti. Nokia did not like the fact that there is no foreign production on sale. Michelin is kinda pricey. Has pros: Installed on a Mazda CX5. Compared to the standard Yokohama 98A, it is noticeably stiffer, but much more informative steering wheel, it is easier to enter turns at speed, the rearrangement is subjectively easier. Deep tread, rows dirt well. Crushed stone gets stuck, at speed it can shoot into arches. After the winter Nokia, the car feels more…

My thoughts after using it.Different pros: Smooth running Quiet Manageability at the level Got cons: The tread gets stoned Sidewalls are just no Expensive

If the speed is a little more in a turn or at the exit, it pulls off even abruptly, the feeling is not pleasant, so not for fast driving

With its pros: put on the duster, all the rules! We'll see in a year) I'll add it! 3 seasons have passed With its cons: the cord crumbles, when replacing it with a winter one, the installers showed how it comes off in layers.

If the speed is a little more in a turn or at the exit, it pulls off even abruptly, the feeling is not pleasant, so not for fast driving

Excellent tires! For the city and for bad roads - it's the most. For the "German autobahns", of course the H/T bridge would be better.