Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 149
  • 5
    77
  • 4
    28
  • 3
    21
  • 2
    8
  • 1
    15

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Great product, best quality.

I bought Cordiant Snow Cross 215/70 R16 for Outlander 3 after Gislaveda, the tires are softer, there are more spikes, it rows perfectly, good grip on ice, in terms of handling - it goes where you steer - Gislaved could not boast of this. The pattern is similar to Hakka 7, it was balanced easily - they didn’t strain at the tire shop . It costs 2 times cheaper than Hakki 7, I don’t see any reason to overpay for Nokian . Optimal price-quality ratio . .

Pros
  • many spikes Tread pattern similar to Hakku 7 soft adequate price
Cons
  • the hum is present, but not as reactive as they say in the reviews, the tire has not yet been run-in, I think it will be quieter . I used to ride on the Gislaved Nord Frost 100, the hum on it will be more than on the Cordiant Snow Cross (not run-in) .

Revainrating 3 out of 5

The product did not cause delight, but you can use it.

But for now, there is still six months before a full-fledged assessment of quality. Winter is still ahead, and 2 days is not an indicator :) : well, I wrote a review six months later . . my opinion has changed a lot, tires, in general, are disappointed Its pros: Quiet. I took 2 pieces, one wheel was immediately balanced to 0 (I haven’t had this before :) ) Its cons: After one winter season, 8 spikes flew out. During this time, 4-5 t. km drove. I hoped that I would not get stuck . . nevermind

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Nothing unusual, a normal product.

Set 16 radius. For 1 winter, 2 out of 4 tires went to scrap. They pierce themselves with spikes 5-7 pieces at a time. It was used mainly in urban conditions, sometimes leaving the city for the weekend. Would I buy these again - no, would recommend to someone - no

Revainrating 4 out of 5

No complaints, I recommend to buy.

I went on many rubbers, I can only say good things about this one, and if it were not for the hernia, the rating would be 5. If you drive carefully, don’t think, it is no worse than all the cool brands

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Great value for money, one of the best offers.

I got hired in 4 years my driving style is reasonable. I can't imagine myself at any Finnish stage of the rally. that's the main thing to start with. and for my needs, these wheels came up to all 100. I don’t start with a slip, and I start to slow down 10 meters before the traffic light. for 4 winters, studs were lost: 15 percent in front, 5 in the back. It’s funny to read in the reviews of winter tires that they don’t hold well on the track under 130-140)) the tread clings and rows normally at

Pros
  • now 4 winters on them - arranged completely cling rowing
Cons
  • make noise like all thorns

Revainrating 1 out of 5

I will never repeat this purchase.

Do not take this rubber, for the first month it will please you, but then you will hate both the rubber and the manufacturer. The attitude of the manufacturer is disrespectful. I lost the check, the rubber is 8 months old, two wheels are on the chamber, it can be seen that the first manufacturing defect. The second through the spikes poisons wildly. Answer from support, please contact where you bought it, they don’t even have a representative office in St. Petersburg. As a result, it’s better…

Pros
  • Quiet in the snow, soft.
Cons
  • Unmanaged, two wheels already have cameras. One just cracked, cracks can be seen from the inside. On the second, he descends through the spikes, found 6 places.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Not a bad purchase, worth the money.

The tread pattern is a copy of Nokian Nordman 7 and Nordman 7 SUV, also known as Hakkapellita 7 SUV. Operated on Renault Duster 4x4. Also operated a different size on the Renault Logan. Overall a solid 4 considering the price. In the budget segment, this tire has the best value for money. If for small sizes you can throw a little and take something better, then for 215/70 r16 the difference is already noticeable. Therefore, the larger the size, the more due to the price Cordiant wins compared…

Pros
  • - The main advantage is the price. - Well balanced. (When buying, check that there is one batch or at least one week of production. 4-digit code on the sidewall xxyu, where xx is the serial number of the week of manufacture in the year, yy is the year of manufacture. ) - Good road holding on a straight line and cornering. - In this size, it swallows well the rutting on the road when changing lanes. - The tread well removes water and snow porridge at positive temperatures. - Rowing well in loose snow. - Feels good on clean ice with new spikes (I don't know what will happen next) - The studs hold up well if run-in is done beforehand. (based on opinions of 4 independent car owners) - Moderately noisy (at size 215/70) - Large selection of sizes.
Cons
  • - The tread width is much narrower than that of competitors, the tire has the following profile: \__/, this should be taken into account when choosing the size. With a tire width of 215, the tread width corresponds to approximately 205-195. (I did not take this into account, it was worth taking 225 or even 235) - Due to the shape of the profile, it is difficult to get out of a deep rut. - The rubber compound is harsh for the 2022n winter, at -30 friction clutches (notches) do not work. - Long braking distance on icy pavement. Use with caution without ABS - In hard snow or at positive temperatures in the mud, it is washed out and does not row. - Sellers often have a variety of sorts by batch and date of manufacture.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Nothing unusual, normal product.

The car on which I put these tires: Renault Logan stepway 2022/ Life / 113 hp Has some pros: Not a bad tire for the money. Moderately noisy. Up to 40 km / h inclusive, almost inaudible. Pretty easy to install and balance. When driving in the city, well included in the turns. With soft braking, it brakes well. After the winter, not a single thorn fell out. Cons: With sharp or fast braking, the car starts to roll like on skates (the ABS and ESP systems do not save). At a high angle of entry into…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best purchase in my life, I will definitely buy it again.

I bought this rubber last year, the season was off with a bang! Satisfied with the quality, albeit 2022n production. For this price, excellent tires, definitely enough for 3-4 seasons. So far, there are some pluses in this rubber, it doesn’t hit, it doesn’t throw. Definitely recommend to buy if you want to meet a small budget :)

Pros
  • 1. Good handling 2. Wear resistance 3. Softness 4. Tenacious properties 5. Number of spikes 6. Price-quality
Cons
  • 1. Does not hold high speed very well

Revainrating 1 out of 5

Disgusting, will never recomend it for anybody!

They postponed the delivery date, as a result, they didn’t bring it on the postponed day, and then canceled it! I lost time while I was waiting, I lost money, the goods became more expensive and now I have to pay 2022s. more, and even a refund you need to wait! I read the reviews, it turns out that there have already been such cases with this seller, draw conclusions, I wish not to get into such a situation! Seller DO NOT RECOMMEND! ! The next day I went to find out the price in my city, it…

Pros
  • No
Cons
  • Solid

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A nice option for the money, one of the best deals.

I drove only 50 km on it, but the first impressions are very good, the stability is excellent on snow and icy asphalt, the road keeps well. Of the minuses after the summer noisy on the pavement, like all studded tires. Great tires for the money! I recommend

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A great option for this money, I definitely recommend it!

Promptly delivered, right to the car, helped to reload. From order to delivery - 1 day. Called before delivery. The wheels were tested on snow and ice during the day, so far everything is worthy. There is a certain level of noise, but it is expected, therefore I do not attribute it to disadvantages - earlier there were noisier winter tires, there is something to compare with. I recommend the seller.

Pros
  • Price quality
Cons
  • Not found yet

about the Cordiant Snow Cross, I will say this: the rubber allows you to drive quite well, not particularly caring about the condition of the coating. It goes through icy turns at speed very predictably, you can easily drown 130 km / h on an icy road with ruts in the asphalt. I went to the ice circuit this year - the tires behave very well on bare ice, absolutely the same sensations as on Gislaved or Hakka. I want to say that I have something to compare this Cordiant with: 1. Michelin X-Ice…

Pros
  • - Very good and predictable behavior and braking on ice. Maybe just a little worse than the famous brands. It allows you to brake on icy asphalt without losing the trajectory, for example, when overtaking, from a speed of 120-130 km / h. - It behaves very predictably in icy asphalt ruts (I have a size of 215\60\16). - Perfectly holds the road in the snow, as well as at positive temperatures - in snow porridge and mud. - A good start from a place on the ice. - The installers were afraid that over time, the passage of air through the holes for the spikes begins. But after three seasons everything is fine (t-t-t). - Properly run-in tires make noise comparable to summer tires. Having changed my shoes now, I understand that the noise is almost the same as on the summer BridgeStone Turanza. And this is not a buzz, like some, but I would say, rustling. - Balanced when buying with very small loads, after 45t. km. balancing is normal. - The loss of studs per 45t. km is about 15%, more than a decent result, considering my riding style. - The price is more than reasonable.
Cons
  • - Noise for about the first 2022-3000 t. km. After this run, the noise is noticeably reduced. - There is a slight increase in braking distance on ice at temperatures from -16 to -19. If -15 or warmer, then it holds perfectly, if -20 or colder, it is also excellent. Namely, in this temperature range it is slightly worse. But I think this is not critical, eminent tires also have such effects.

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Not worth the money, I will not advise this product.

Bought for the price. Didn't live up to expectations. For 1 winter drove about 11,000 km. The spikes are in place, but have worn off. Only the bases of the spikes remained. My father has a different rubber (I don’t remember the name) that is running for the 3rd season, the spikes have not yet worn off. Car of the same class (sedan), the same driving style. It makes no sense to take such rubber, because. no longer fulfills its function, good braking on ice. For the new season, you need new…

Pros
  • Price. Hong Kongeability is normal.
Cons
  • Very noisy as long as there are spikes. As the spikes wear out, it gets quieter.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

A good product, more pros than cons.

Size 185/60/15, Kalina 2 Sport. Compared to the summer 195/50/16 at a temperature of +5 on asphalt: 1. terrible road holding 2. throws on a rut 3. pulls to the side when braking 4. faster than 160 km/h is dangerous (although the index is 190 km/h - what could be better than dry asphalt? ) The high soft tread breaks down on asphalt, a constant feeling of rolliness, shakiness. Where does the index 190 km / h come from? Apparently only for ideal asphalt, which is available only on toll roads…

Pros
  • 1. Traction in snow and mud 2. Grip on ice (so far new) 3. Workmanship 4. Relatively low noise (only spikes make noise, the tread itself seems to be absent)
Cons
  • 1. Behavior on dry and wet pavement 2. Stud reliability

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I didnt expect the quality to be so high.

Rubber is soft, does not tan even in severe frost. The spikes are very reliable. After two winters of intensive use, almost everything is in place. Although he did not spare the rubber and slipped not only on ice and snow, but also on asphalt. Fortunately, the diesel engine allows it. ))) The patency in the snow is excellent, it bites into the ice like teeth. On an ice slide, starting is not a problem at all! Plus the price is amazing!

Pros
  • I liked the tires
Cons
  • didn't see

I left for 2 seasons, about 25t. km . the wheel began to flatten, they saw in the tavern that it was poisoning from under the spike, they pulled out the spike, put a tourniquet. After a couple of weeks, it descends again, already poisoning from 4 spikes. The verdict is to put the camera, or throw it out. The blessing that in a week to change shoes while pumping up. The ride is not aggressive, without slipping, for 2 winters 25-30 percent of spikes flew out

Pros
  • rowing in the snow is excellent, the price.
Cons
  • buzzes, spikes fly out, leads poorly on ice, poisons the air from under the spikes