- Soft 1. Cost
- 1. unattractive Two problems with balancing
- Exceptional fuel economy and handling in rainy conditions
- noisy
- -Calm - of superior quality - turns well; - excellently handles a wet road and puddles on the CADE; at 150 km/h on brand-new tires, it captured a respectable puddle; if only henna! - consumption (with the introduction of the all-season Kama, people's typical consumption decreased by 0.3–0.4 liters.) - typical deterioration for soft rubber And, what is of the utmost importance, the cost!
- No
- The dry asphalt it stands up nicely, and the wet asphalt isn't horrible either, plus it's cheap.
- Compared to other tires I've owned, these aren't the quietest. But they don't yell either (they're not the softest, in my opinion). Tires with worn bearings that haven't been rotated in a while.
- Resistance to hydroplaning and handling.
- Extremely Loud.
- Ability to maintain control up to 90 kilometers per hour Resistance to Wear Balancing Noise Price
- Handling after 90km/h On this tire, it is risky to accelerate faster than 80 kilometers per hour when the road is wet and faster than 120 kilometers per hour when the road is dry.
- Excellent tires that are simple to control both in the city and on the highway. Have not yet experimented with driving off-road. Brakes well.
- Although it could be that the engine is noisy (I have a Largus), it starts to make a racket at a speed of 85 kilometers per hour.
- Quieter than average. Don't worry about hydroplaning in a rut in the water. Inexpensive.
- Produced in 2022, which may or may not be a negative depending on how strictly quality controls are adhered to. The tires do not bear the Pirelli brand name.
- quiet, steady control in every mode, track, rain, curves, acceleration, and braking. simple balancing.
- nowhere is the term PIRELLI:)
- - Quiet - Comfortable - not pricey - Non-symmetrical - Possessing excellent tackability
- There is no trace of the Pirelli brand (the label simply states, "Designed by Pirelli")
- superior style, layout, price strategy, and equilibrium
- Totally missed it