Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 24
  • 5
    16
  • 4
    2
  • 3
    3
  • 2
    2
  • 1
    1

Type of review

The Michelin's grip from a standstill is good, but under braking the Yokohama catches and stops earlier and more comfortably. In corners, the Yokohama is punchy and understandable regardless of driving style. Rigidity is moderate, adequate, I would say ideal on a 55 profile. Before buying in the store, I was told that Yokohama is a terrible tire and needs to be removed and thrown into the trash. In fact, it turned out that this Michelin tire, which is too soft and slows badly, is also unstable…

Pros
  • Review of the unreasonably expensive and hyped Michelin Pilot Sport4 tires installed on a V55 Camry 3.5 car. It will be about whether it makes sense to put Michelin on a civilian car and will this rubber improve the safety, handling and comfort of your car? Previously, I could not confidently answer this question. Before the review, I want to say that at this point in time I am competent to evaluate these tires, as I have an understanding of why they are purchased and how the behavior of a car on the road with different tires under the same weather conditions can change. In addition to understanding, there is experience of driving different sports cars and tires: Jaguar F Type 3.0 380 hp with Bridgestone tires, Audi A7 3.0 - 340 hp Bridgestone, and Lexus RC 317 hp with Dunlop rear wheel drive. My personal Camry 3.5 car at that time was on worn-out Yokohama factory tires, I thought that if I put on more expensive tires, I could improve handling and traction with asphalt a little without changing the factory wheel parameter, without even allowing the thought that it was possible make it worse. In one TV show I heard the loud name Michelin "Pilot Sport 4". Sounds like I thought, studied the list of cars on which it is installed and thought about purchasing. Whom I will not ask opinions are different. Now I understand exactly the car or tire you personally should like and until you try it yourself, you will never know your opinion. The store claimed it was the best tire in the world, pointing to road tests. They said that I would be pleased, take no doubt. I decided to try it in factory size 215/55/17 and ended up writing a very negative review.
Cons
  • 5 months have passed since the purchase, and I tested the tire in different modes ranging from +5 to +34. The tire is very quiet, that's where its advantages end. I often go into turns and rings at a speed of 60-70 km / h. - whistles loudly. Yokohama has never made such a whistle in 7 years of owning Camry cars. I had three new Carmis, of course with new Yokohama tires. One V50 with a 2.5 engine and two V55 cars with a 3.5 engine. Further, due to the fact that the Michelin has a thin side cord, the rubber plays very strongly in the corners on the 55 profile. As soon as I put "Pilot Sport" in the ring, my car turned into jelly compared to what it was. I know many who read the article will say that the Camry is already soft. I agree one hundred percent the suspension is soft, but with Michelin handling has become an order of magnitude worse than on the factory Yokohama. This brings discomfort. In addition to the whistle, I noticed that the directional stability began to blink much more often. The body, when exiting sharp turns, began to make two sometimes three barely noticeable “pendulum” movements.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I can't stop being happy with the purchase, a very good deal!

Stands on the car Audi A4 She has very good grip in any weather, rain or hot asphalt. Rubber is beautiful and most importantly, taxiing has become more predictable and the suspension works out unevenness softer. But after changing from winter to summer, consumption became higher: (from 8 liters to 10 in the city. Although it is possible due to more aggressive summer driving.

Pros
  • Handling and softness
Cons
  • Increased consumption

I am satisfied with the rubber, a good balanced tire, for a quite normal price Audi A4 allroad R18 245/45 Mileage per season ~ 15 tkm. Sufficiently strong sidewall, Hong Kong, Hong Kong and Hong Kong regions, the roads there are so-so, pits and potholes, good hits, the wheels worked with a bang, hernias did not come out, the balance was not disturbed, partly thanks to the 245/45 profile, but as a bonus in favor of Michelin I will say that in the previous summer Pirelli still one hernia…

Pros
  • Durable, hold shock well, hernias have not yet been detected Handling on dry and wet pavement is good Hydroplaning resistance at a fairly good level Quiet and soft Doesn’t notice the track much, but it probably depends on the dimension
Cons
  • For 15 tons, I didn’t seem to notice

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Good product for me, I was satisfied with the price.

235/45/17 (I will compare with michelin primacy 3 as I skated 2 sets) Changed only yesterday to Sport 4, but fresh impressions are the most revealing. The rubber is a little heavier, softer, the tread is higher, hence more comfort is expected, it is quiet and smooths out small bumps in the road well. I expected more controllability from rubber, the tread has more inseparable blocks and a directional pattern, probably from here there is an effect that the car goes straight on rails as if…

Pros
  • Definitely comfortable tires, quiet and soft. Well dampens small bumps in the road,
Cons
  • It feels like the steering wheel has become heavier at zero (I’ll explain below)