In general, I am satisfied with the device before using the a330 compared to it, this camera is much better, the colors are not so juicy. The colors on the camera with the latest firmware have become more faded, finally there is no excess of red. I recommend taking this camera, and fast Minoltov lenses or native ones, then you will see excellent colors, and not soap on a whale lens.

The device is excellent. mp. the picture looks much better than its competitors in all respects (in the viewer it is somewhere around 65-70% = 16-18mp.) purely personal opinion, 4-5 years ago there was a lot of noise about both the 16 megapixel matrix and the support for lens resolution) Good shots for everyone. Pros below: Hello everyone. In general, I bought this device for myself, I am very pleased. I will not describe the merits of the photo, everyone who took pictures knows that the…

I took this camera as the best in its price category in terms of video shooting, and in terms of photography too . I am more than satisfied with the choice! I solved the lack of a noisy matrix by buying a fast lens, which made it possible to simply make the ISO smaller)) But in general, the camera is very cool))) We never regretted that we chose it! Has pros: a lot . a 24-megapixel sensor, a bunch of all sorts of gadgets, such as, for example, highlighting the object on which the camera is…

I started with Smena, Zorkiy, fed, Zeniths 3pcs, Sony N2, Nikon D50, Sony A33-2 years old, there was an idea to change the system to learn in comparison. I tested Canon 650 and Nikon D90 - I liked the latter more for its natural color, but came to to the conclusion that they are not looking for good from good. I took the A65 without regret, now in search of decent optics.

Opinion, as a beginner, a suitable camera, especially for dynamic scenes. No limit on the upper ISO limit in automatic mode is not critical, I rarely use this mode, but my relatives are not so picky about the settings, hence the strong noise in low light. There are no problems in daylight. In automatic mode, the white balance with an incandescent lamp is set incorrectly, it appears in yellowness, manual setting corrects the situation. Eh, the camera is good, but now there is a problem with…

Bought an A65. Made in Japan is written (for me - so at best in one of the developing countries, and not in the queen of technology). I watched 2 copies - both with back focus. One whale glass is oblique at one angle. In another, the glass evenly lathers the corners, but the carcass backfocuses a little more clearly. He took it. In the service, by the way, on the day of purchase it is impossible to hand over. And the terms for adjusting the soneks in the Copy are not encouraging.…

An excellent camera, 2 years before it A33, Nikon D90, Nikon D 50, -A65 is undoubtedly better, optics (Sony 16 = 105, Minolta 50 \ 1.7, Minolta 100 macro and 100-300) bought via the Internet in Hong Kong. The seller turned out to be honest and responsive to many questions that arose. I threw the whale lens into the archive, although it had no deviations from the parameters, and with the acquired optics, the camera is CLASS !

Of course, this is not a physical cant, rather a feature. In general, I fell for the myth that Sony is a good choice for shooting video, I also fell for the advice of my uncle photographer. In fact, the quality of both the video material and the sound from the camera upset me very much ! I can write a lot about this, so already in three months I got the impression and opinion about the Sony SLT 65 camera, which, unfortunately, I bought in the blind hope that this camera manufacturer would be a…

I bought myself exactly the 65th model, since I was dissuaded from the 77th model (they say it’s easier to add a full-matrix 850 to buy a used one than to throw out so much for a crop) There is certainly logic in this . I was not very upset by the noise, since the detailing is even very worthy, and if you reduce the size to 18 mp, then the noise will be even less than that of the brothers kenons and nikons))) I chose between Nikon 5100 (sort of) well and alpha (I don’t like Kenons for pop) ) I…

For beginners and amateurs, this is not a camera, but a dream. I chose between Canon D60 and Nikon D7000. The Sony A65 beats the competitors I have chosen in almost all respects. Now the direct competitor is Nikon D5200. This is an excellent camera. But the advantages of the Sony Alpha 65 in the rate of fire, illumination of contours in the sharpness zone, in the stabilizer built into the carcass, longer shutter life, electronic level in the viewfinder, electronic magnifier, screwdriver make…

Worked on Olympus C-8080 then switched to Canon 600D. I will say right away that Canon is more like a domestic car - noisy, big, not comfortable, stupid! Sony, like a foreign car - a quiet mirror, the rate of fire is awesome, the quality of the pictures is on top. I do not regret that I took the whale version, although I immediately bought a 75-300 lens for it and in general everything became gorgeous. I shoot both distant and close objects. In short, in one word - WOW.

I am very pleased with the camera. Excellent video with fast and clear focus unlike NIKON, built-in stabilizer that allows you to use cheap TVs, the ability to view photos in detail in any sun - it's all just great. The only real downside is the soft controls. If CANON has a mode selection dial, while NIKON simply “snaps” the positions more clearly, SONY has everything very soft - both the dial and the inclusion. It's nice when working, BUT you put the device in your bag, and take it out with…

Great device for the hobbyist. Video shooting with a standard lens at a height. I got off the bus and dropped it on the asphalt from a height of about 1.70. Not a single scratch, the lens saved the filter, the filter itself was in smithereens. Further operation of the device did not reveal any deviations in operation after a strong blow. I hesitated for a long time when buying (before that there was an alpha 230), I looked at another 650D. Definitely a nicer body and a stupid matrix - if you…

I chose this camera, the first DSLR, because of the general advantages of SLT technology: constant phase AF in video mode, increased rate of fire, simplification of the camera design due to the lack of slamming mirror mechanics (in theory, longer service life), EVI (although for some this is a disadvantage) , the use of VI and LiveView is the same in speed. As for the noise of the 24MP matrix, everything is also somewhat exaggerated here. Yes, there is noise and there are a lot of them at high

In general, I am satisfied, I originally took it for shooting a video. In terms of video quality, it is quite up to semi-professional camcorders. Yes, and the photos are very good, at night it also does an excellent job. The photo is quite clear, there is not much noise, good color reproduction. Although for me personally, Nikons do a better job with photos. Has some pros I bought it primarily for shooting video - and so the quality of the video is better for the money you won’t find .…

While I'm shooting with KIT 18-55. Everything is fine, it’s even scary to buy a serious lens - what if everything remains the same? By the way, at first I was afraid that the battery was not holding. charged in the evening - and he was discharged in the morning. After the second charge (12 hours) it already began to work as it should. Got pros: Very beautiful. Ideal for girls. I don't want to let go of my hands. It is very convenient to work with various professional modes - an explanation on…

I bought a65 + 18-55 kit as a gift. I wanted to check the lens and matrix when buying, but it didn’t work out. I took it, hoping for Japanese quality and a seal. The next day I checked the matrix, AF, and what . BACKFOCUS at 0.5-1 DOF, which is very noticeable, but not noticeable enough to change the camera in the store. And judging by the reviews on a specialized forum, problems with the focus of the a65 are a very common thing. And what surprised me the most was the lack of any possibility of

So. For almost a year I used and learned to take pictures on the Sony DSC-HX200. In the end, very good pictures for the soap dish began to turn out. I stuffed my hands, the fotik stopped taking pictures of me. It was decided to buy a SLR. Like many, I chose between Canon and Nikon. At the time of the first purchase, I chose the Nikon D3200. Photographed for a week. I didn't like the photos. Noise even at low ISO. I decided to change this device to the usual Sony. I had to add 7.5 thousand to…

To begin with, the camera was bought as a replacement for my Canon 400D. In the hope that during this time the matrices have become less noisy and other characteristics have grown. I chose this camera, because it was the only one in it that had GPS (by the nature of its activity it is necessary, GPS is found only in very plush soap dishes or very expensive Nikona models. I don’t consider Samsung as a technique). Firstly, I’ll tell everyone that GPS is only available in models containing the…

I have been shooting with this A65 camera for the 13th month. I can't find an impossible task for her. No, of course, tasks must also be set wisely. Without a flash at night, she will not take good pictures with her hands. I read a lot of criticism on the Sony Club about this camera in comparison with its older sister A77, and yet I see no reason to be dissatisfied with it. Some write about a downed autofocus - is that - I, therefore, was lucky? I get into focus, as a rule, on the first try. Or