Review on Camera Nikon Z6 Body, black by Yagami Iori

Completely happy with the apparatus! Work equipment that is both versatile and resistant to wear and tear. I chose approximately three months, in comparison with the Sony a7-3, the Kenon R, the Fujifilm gsh5, and the Fujifilm xt-4. In comparison, I experienced everything in one location, and I borrowed all five devices from different people. The screen and the bitrate of the video, which crumbles at the smallest mistake on shooting + menu, pricey optics, caused Sony to depart almost instantly. It will suffice for shooting weddings and blogs, but not for professional shooting with autofocus. Regarding the Kenon, the film makes it seem like a joke, despite the fact that there are a lot of things that are quite pleasant and ergonomic at the level. I would like to snap a picture of it. Fuji had no comprehension whatsoever; it appears that this is a toy for amateur performers; despite this, he was nevertheless shocked by the sounds. It would appear that individuals who get Fujifilm for advertising purposes as well as very advanced amateurs are its target audience. whatever it is. Only because of the memory card and the autofocus in the video, many have voiced their dissatisfaction with Nikon. As a consequence of this, autofocus was completed after five months, RAV video was supplied, and memory cards with 128 GB could be purchased on eBay for a price of 12, which was plenty for any photo or video shooting. Because of the high speed of the card, loading content onto a laptop equipped with an SSD takes no more than 15 minutes. Something is not entirely clear. Why are Nikon's marketers showing such a lack of initiative? Why is it that nobody is familiar with this equipment in its current state, and everyone agrees that it was not a very successful experiment carried out by Nikon?