Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Joshua Douglas photo
1 Level
784 Review
57 Karma

Review on ๐Ÿงญ Optimize Your Fieldwork with the Harbin Geological Compass DQL-8: A Reliable and Efficient Tool by Joshua Douglas

Revainrating 4 out of 5

First impression: Well built but needs improvement

I have two Brunton Pocket Transits. My first is a plastic Com Pro 5008 and my second is a Brunton with an aluminum body from the 1950's. I used them to explore caves. They are no longer used by cavers, but in some situations they work better as tools like the Sunnto. I bought this mainly because it intrigued me and wanted to see how it compares to my other Brunton compasses. I'm really surprised how good it is considering how much it costs (55.00). I made several azimuth measurements. with him and, compared to the real Brunton, and they are at the top; However, Harbin is a bit more difficult to use. The reasons I say harder are as follows. The image in the mirror is slightly distorted compared to Brunton. This becomes more apparent when looking at a distant target. I don't think it's a glass mirror. The bullseye plane wasn't that easy to center, it was a bit jerky but still usable. The needle took longer to settle compared to the Plastic Com Pro, but about the same time as the older Brunton, but you can always slow the swing down with the needle lifting mechanism. rattling noise. I did some angle measurements and was amazed at the smoothness of the movement and got the same results as the Brunton. You have to be careful because the degree and percent verniers are reversed. It's not about much protection. I ordered a medium sized leather tape measure from Forestry Supply for use in the field. I tried using a Brunton ball and a Harbin compass socket and although it fit the slots it didn't tighten enough to snap into place as the slots were too deep. a seal that would allow the use of a ball head. Conclusion: For the money, this is a reasonably used tool. If the manufacturer had used a glass mirror (which is the compass's biggest drawback), a slightly better bullseye level and the same lateral tolerance slots as the Brunton, it would have been a big improvement. It's still very good for the price. Pocket transport, and I'll probably be less afraid of damaging it, so I'll be more likely to carry it with me.

Pros
  • Doping ๐Ÿ”ฅ
Cons
  • Expensive