Review on Canon EOS 5D Mark II Body Camera by Athit Samatiyadekul ᠌

I advise you to look through the manual - especially to the owners of the first Piglets - interesting features have been added, such as priority in highlights (the best study in highlights is a kind of increase in Dynamic Range), grids when using Live View, and of Live View itself)) Got pros: A wonderful camera, compared to the first heel, is a breakthrough, although the first one is very good. It is quite possible to work up to iso 6400 (subjectively) - the noise has taken on a completely different look - instead of a vile mush, it has acquired an texture, such as "noble film grain"))) I read that people had problems with AF - everything is wonderful for me, in in any case, it’s definitely not worse than the first patch - it’s possible that there are problems when using very fast optics - I don’t know, I haven’t tried it - I can say one thing with Planar 85 1.4 everything works great, a small percentage of errors (though there is only confirmation of the focus, so the example is somewhat incorrect ) - with zooms 70-200 2.8 is / 24-70 2.8 - there are no problems. With better AF, there is a 1D (s) series - but it costs completely different money. The detailing of the 5D mk II is excellent. I repeat that even though the first Five is a very worthy camera, the difference with it is PENSIBLE. Its cons: The White Balance presets are a bit of a lie, but Auto BB does it quite well (not perfect, but quite, quite). Sometimes there is not much speed - of course, there is also a 1D (s) series for this, but nevertheless it was possible, by analogy with Nikon - to add Drive when buying a battery grip - let's say for 1k / sec. The camera has become a little lighter, relative to 5D - which is rather unusual at first. But this is more of a quibble.