For a long time I wanted to change my Casio WS-300 to something more solid and always metal, I chose for a long time and finally chose it. I won’t say that I found the perfect watch for myself, but I have too many requirements) Of the shortcomings - the most important - there is no month, you will have to do without it, of course. The screen also glares, and it looks like not glass, but the solar panel itself. The absence of some numbers is somewhat unusual. The accuracy is +7 seconds per month, I would like less, I turned off the synchronization, it does not catch in Hong Kong. But in general, all the shortcomings are rather nit-picking and the search for an ideal. Of the advantages, everything else, elegant design, sapphire crystal, steel case, etc. During the winter holidays, I charged it to the limit, the charge became HI. Then I wore it under my sleeve (I always wear it like that). About a week and a half later, the charge became MID. I didn’t charge it on purpose, at home after work in the light of a light bulb, only brief moments. After more than three months, the charge remained MID. Therefore, it makes no sense to specifically charge it, apparently. The bracelet fit well on the hand after pulling out four links. In general, the watch is not for every hand, on a thick and powerful one it will probably still look small. Just on mine.
CASIO W-800H-1A Wrist Watch
63 Review
CASIO A-168WA-1 quartz watch, alarm clock, chronograph, stopwatch, waterproof, display backlight
45 Review
Watch CASIO A-168WA-1
47 Review
Smart watch Xiaomi Watch S1 Wi-Fi NFC Global for Russia, Silver/Brown leather strap gray fluoroplast strap
40 Review