Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Adam Walendzik ᠌ photo
1 Level
357 Review
0 Karma

Review on Smartphone Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra 4G 8/256 GB, Dual nano SIM, bronze by Adam Walendzik ᠌

Revainrating 3 out of 5

I can't say that I was completely satisfied with the product.

Since this is not the very first Note phone to be released, there is something to compare it to and, more generally, there is an opportunity to study the general progression of the range. After using the smartphone for ten days, a general impression of it emerged, although this is not to claim that all of the expectations were satisfied. The capabilities of the pen and the top camera have always been the most important aspects of this range of products for me personally. If you actively use at least a portion of the device's stylus, then there are no alternatives to a smartphone. The pen has evolved to the point where it is no longer just a tool for doodling but rather a full-fledged component of the device that has various tasks. As a result, you have no choice but to tolerate everything else. However, here is the obstruction to the camera. The fact that it protrudes quite a bit, which renders it hard to use the phone without a case, and the fact that using a case causes the smartphone to become more cumbersome - both of these things are to be expected, and prior to making the purchase, we were required to come to terms with them. On the other hand, I was not anticipating the camera to turn out to be such a raucous rattling. A tiny turn of the phone - a knock, as if something had fallen off and rolled, shake the phone a little - and under this rumble you may tap dance) I thought it was a marriage, so I started to research the reviews, and people write that this is the norm: the official response is that this stabilizer rattles. Strange, but if the camera is so good, you can probably just ignore it and get on with your day. However, it was discovered that my wife's Note 10 with the regular little 12MP module shoots just as well under standard conditions, and in many cases, it shoots much better under tough conditions. I looked for the location where I could change the general camera settings, but it seems that both phones have their cameras set up the same way. The phone's independence is the device's most significant drawback. After lunch, the phone will need to be recharged if you don't use it too heavily. Therefore, the charger is always available. Damn, yes, I used to have a Chinese smartphone that was three years old that maintained its charge better. The screen is really impressive in terms of its size and brightness, but the greatest possible resolution cannot be employed. Alternately, it is conceivable, but only for a limited duration: a battery that is already in poor condition will not allow the device to continue functioning for a significant amount of time until lunch. In most cases, the fingerprint sensor will not work, and you will be required to enter a code to unlock the screen. The smartphone is nimble in general, but there are times when it freezes completely, particularly when you are dealing with the camera. However, there are some glaring advantages: The exterior of the phone has a stylish appearance, especially when it is white.

Pros
  • The display, the overall design of the mobile device, as well as the functionality and capabilities of the stylus
Cons
  • Weak autonomy; I expected more from the camera, which turned out to be a block that bulged and rattled.