Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Anand Kumar Singh ᠌ photo
1 Level
117 Review
86 Karma

Review on Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM lens, black by Anand Kumar Singh ᠌

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Everything about the product satisfied me, the price is perfect.

Used numerous times, both on the crop and the FF. Various. I was given a test by several pals. A while back, I decided to get my own (on FF). Yet, this comes at the sacrifice of quality. It is not required that you test it on your body first. Inquire whether there are any left in the store. The target ought to be immediately captured by the lens (by 1.4). In the event that there is a difficulty, you should not accept it. I will elucidate. It is not in the least bit required to draw attention to a particular line. Draw attention to the lettering that is angled toward the lens and can be found abundantly on store shelves. You are able to get a good look at the target using this lens, which is functioning properly (neighboring letters should be in pleasant bokeh). Individuals who write about the rear / front focus of 2-3 millimeters overestimate their capacity to correctly aim at an absolute point in space. In regard to the degree of sharpness. The lens has excellent clarity. Guaranteed to be of professional quality. On the other hand, if sharpness is your super-idea, then you should really think about going with the 85/1.8 choice (if the transfer of the smallest texture of the skin, micro-reflections of water droplets on the skin, etc. is important). It is a well-known fact that in accordance with the rules of optics, the sharpness of an image is directly proportional to the focal length of the lens. This has nothing to do with the model, and even more importantly, it has nothing to do with the cost of the lens. It is not possible for the L-series to produce a width that is sharper than the least expensive, such as 50/1.8. whereas focal (resulting perspective, etc.) suffers as a result. About the crop: a clear portrait, no higher than the waist. In this scenario, the number of possible shooting points available to you will be restricted. It is not practical for an environment that is not a studio, in my opinion. It works wonderfully out in nature. On FF: universal portrait and genre-portrait lens. On a desolate beach, when there is the possibility to run around, and you want to shoot a model in full-length while keeping all of the tiny details, then possibly an 85/1.8 lens would be best (amazing optics, I tell you, but only in the conditions mentioned above). The 85mm lens has a flatter and more "official" profile when viewed from the side. 50 millimeters, which means "live," "natural," and "here is the model; you can touch it." In a similar vein as this.

Pros
  • Drawings of artists focusing on portraiture
Cons
  • Avoid making references to the design of the lens in this context. The consistency of the product's construction quality is where all of the issues lie (manufacturing).