Maybe I just got a bad pair? I had these 4 days but I have 2 main problems: 1) The lower correction part of the lens (1.75 in my case), the lenses rise too high. Looking through the top of the (presumably uncorrected) glasses I see too much of a 1.75 bifocal lens. There is no smooth transition from the uncorrected peak to the 1.75 of the lens. It's too distracting. I understand these are not progressive lenses. But when I look straight ahead I see too much downward correction. If the 1.75 part of the lens started just 1/8 inch lower it would be a lot better. Tried adjusting the nose piece to raise and lower the goggles, didn't help. 2) Possibly the worst. The top part of the glasses should be "uncorrected" and transparent. Mine aren't. There is a blur at the top of the lens, as if there's some sort of correction that I clearly don't want or need. It's very minor, but it's enough to be overly uncomfortable and annoying. It's a shame, otherwise I really like these glasses. Again, maybe I got a bad pair. When I opened the packaging they looked used (weird packaging and one of the hangers was bent). Unfortunately I can't recommend it.
Anti-Blue Light Blocking Reading Glasses For Women - NORPERWIS 2 Pair Computer Glasses
47 Review
Eyekepper Small Oval Round Reading Glasses Vintage Mini Reader Eyeglasses For Men Women Reading With Spring Hinges Tortoise Frame +1.50
34 Review
4 Pack Women'S Reading Glasses With Spring Hinge And Laser Pattern Design - Kerecsen Readers For Ladies.
23 Review
5 Pairs Reading Glasses - Standard Fit Spring Hinge Readers For Men & Women | NORPERWIS
37 Review
Contact lenses Bausch & Lomb PureVision 2, 6 pcs., R 8.6, D -2
72 Review
Yomandamor Mens Coolmax Ankle Wide Stretched Diabetic Socks With Seamless Toe,5 Pairs
34 Review
Contact lenses Bausch & Lomb Ultra, 3 pcs., R 8.5, D -4.25
32 Review
COOLMAX Fiber Non-Binding Crew Socks For Women With Extra Wide Top - Multipack From MediPeds
20 Review