Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Kero Kero แ Œ photo
1 Level
114 Review
34 Karma

Review on ๐ŸŽง Discontinued Sennheiser CX 2.00i Black In-Ear Canal Headset Available for Purchase by Kero Kero แ Œ

Revainrating 2 out of 5

A useless product, it's not worth the money.

As I understand it, zenkhs have switched to outright exploitation of the brand. Yes. The top models are great. But they also cost quite obscene money. And zenkhs now multiply the price by 1.5-2.5 for all models . At the same time, the quality at NON TOP is mediocre. :( In general, marketing rules. It's a pity. Well, other manufacturers care. I compared these headphones with vacuum Sonks . most likely MDR-NC31EM (the model is not written on the headphones, but in appearance it looks like MDR-NC31EM). , but it's the taste and color, as they say. The sound of Sonek MDR is similar to the sound of a good 2.1 system. And the sound of the CX 2.00 Senhs is similar to the sound of an inferior 2.0 system. Itโ€™s a pity that Sony doesnโ€™t have models with a normal remote control with volume control, etc. I wanted to find a replacement for these sleepyheads, but with a full-fledged remote control. Here CX 2.00 is never a replacement. Of the advantages, only a full-fledged remote control that works with the phone, and that they are beautiful. And unfortunately it is impossible to listen to them. The sound is flat and weak . If you take it as a headset for your phone, then CX 2.00 will do, but for listening to music . they do not pull.

Pros
  • 1. Cute. 2. The remote on the iPhone works fully.
Cons
  • 1. There is no bottom when you listen on the iPhone. And if you try to push them with an equalizer, then the headphones begin to burrow, and the bottoms never appear. So it's at a volume of approx. 40%. 2. The wire is too long for me. It goes down to mid-thigh. A person with average height may have to look for where to put him. This is of course a disadvantage. Maybe for someone it will be an advantage. 3. The wire broke after a year. 3000 per box. In a word, the price-quality ratio is not up to par.