When connecting a Samsung A52 phone via Type A (with a regular Type A -> Type C cable), it only outputs 8 watts. But the same cable with a native charger produces 14 watts. But if you connect the same phone via Type C (with a Type C -> Type C cable), then it gives out 18 W (I didn’t even know before that the phone has such a phrase as “very fast charging”). Through Type C, a laptop (Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ABA7) produces 60 W (if you need to charge the battery + load the processor). Through Type A, the laptop does not charge at all (apparently, it needs additional pins to negotiate with the charger). It heats up to about 45 degrees . and it seems that regardless of whether it charges a phone or a laptop. Perhaps due to the fact that it gives out 9 volts to the phone, and 20 volts to the laptop . therefore, with a slight difference in current, the difference in power is more than 2 times. The charger itself weighs 125 g. Much heavier than the native phone charger. At first I even thought that the case was metal. but no, the case is plastic, but it looks solid. By the way, I don't understand why many people here complain about the tight slot. I didn't notice anything like that. The cable holds securely, but is not too hard to insert. In general, a good charger, but it is better to use a Type C cable so that it charges devices quickly.
Wi-Fi router ASUS RT-AC88U, black/red
41 Review
14" Laptop HUAWEI MateBook D 14"NBL-WAQ9R 1920x1080, AMD Ryzen 5 3500U 2.1GHz, RAM 8GB, DDR4, SSD 512GB, AMD Radeon Vega 8, Windows 10 Home, 53010TTB, Space Gray
75 Review
Fast Charging Made Easy with Quick Charger COMMO 20W Compact Charger USB-C
14 Review
6" E-book Amazon Kindle PaperWhite 2018 1440x1080, E-Ink, 8 GB, Standard Equipment, sage
77 Review