Review on Camera Canon PowerShot SX120 IS by Andrey Popov ᠌

I validated it "by hand" visually by shooting a test target based on the ISO-12233 standard. Checked 5 IS came out on top in terms of the aggregate value of all the metrics, +4 months: The longer I use it, the more I see its benefits: After operating for four months, I came to the conclusion that some improvements were needed. The quality of the image matches to the given parameters (10MP) up to iso-800 (did not examine beyond) - 180020222200 lines throughout the world with the virtually full absence of color moiré and Greek patterns, over the entirety of the optical zoom range. +4 months later, the image quality surpasses that of the Nikon D40 DSLR in terms of both resolution and 2 Very low amount of bending. +4mo: 3, which is nearly undetectable anywhere on the planet up to and including iso-400 Nikon L100 noise is "slightly" Quick processing time between each frame in the "auto" mode - around one to one and a half seconds; we haven't watched the other options yet. +4 months: This is even the takeoff and landing of birds at 10 o'clock in the morning! At least in my opinion, this is a comfortable case. The food 2hAA. +4months: - 2.35V, as indicated by CHDK; alternatively, you might stick with 4 7 A gray cat that is quick and of good quality, set against a gray background with very little light) 8 9 This camera comes out on top. 2 Cons: 1 I wanted it to be more affordable. +4 months: I would like a 20 right away. An excessive number of specialized manuals, +4 months: modes with the shutter as the primary control and the aperture as the secondary control, Taking a picture of "how it happened" is highly recommended. Video resolution of 640 by 480 pixels is obviously insufficient for such a machine. +4 months: you should use the format.