Review on 📷 Black Canon PowerShot SX510 HS Digital Camera by Gabi Konieczna ᠌

In general, I can conclude that the device is worth the money because it is undoubtedly superior to my old one and its pricing is reasonable. Even more enjoyable is picking up a Canon gadget, whose menu you are familiar with and where the items are arranged almost exactly the same. Also, the menu is as usual easy to understand. With advantages: Of course, I frequently utilize zoom. Image quality is quite good, especially after the SX 130. Like its older brothers in the line with the same lens, the 130 has significant issues with the lens not yet being able to draw dust. Actually, the lens served as a persuasive argument in favor of buying this particular item. I find the photographs to be fairly excellent. I printed an A4 photo, and everything looks fantastic. A little Photoshop makes everything perfect. You don't require higher quality for A4. Many drawbacks The insufficient battery capacity has always been and will continue to be one of the drawbacks. Clearly, 1000 mAh is insufficient. Even so, there were enough images to last for the entire day and the following one. I frequently capture many pictures at once. I take numerous pictures. Shooting video in full HD is nothing to boast about if the number of photos is still bearable. Film such a video with the understanding that you won't have a charge for long and won't have a method to recharge, and even if it does, it's not always convenient while shooting and not really enjoyable. With such a capacity standard, it appears that the manufacturer is pressuring the user to purchase an additional battery around 2022, which is not cheap. I had to get a Chinese substitute. sends mail. The exposure period in manual mode is limited to 1 second due to ISO 3200's higher sensitivity as compared to prior models. ISO is automatically adjusted to 80 above one second. On the other hand, using the previous camera, I peacefully snapped nighttime pictures at a shutter speed of 15 seconds and an ISO sensitivity of 800. Unfortunately, I haven't yet tried something like 3200 to make up for the short exposure time, but even if I did, the output quality would still be in doubt.