Review on 🕰️ Timeless Elegance: Mudder Classic Smooth Vintage Pocket - Exquisite Style at its Finest by Ted Higdem

I'll leave my original review below but I've changed the rating to one star. The only reason: It didn't keep accurate time, at least for me, and despite what others have said about it being accurate. Clocks, especially battery-powered clocks, have one main requirement today: they have to display the exact time. This one didn't. When he lost the better part of an hour for the first time in a few days, realizing it, I agreed with him when the doubt came up; maybe I left the stem extended unintentionally somehow. The second time I knew, and the clock was thrown back. I would return it but I've had it too long and the cost of returning it would probably be more than the watch was worth. -------------------------------------------------- -------------------- Not the most glamorous watch I've ever owned, but for having keys, a pen and god knows what still in my jeans pocket sit, pretty good. "Love it" as the 4 star caption says. That is if they keep the time as accurate as some people here say and not falling apart like some other people say. The watch is neither durable nor thin; it is between I suspect if you don't rock it and drop it, it will stay together. So for the price I paid it's ok. I don't like watches and my phone is in my pocket, so that's enough. Note: Have a laugh at some of the one-star reviews that complain about the user not being able to start the watch. Watch. I wonder if they are serious or not. I would say yes, they probably mean it because of course it takes all sorts of people to create a world. In their defense, the watch comes with no instructions, not, of course, that they have to be read by those people.