Review on Nikon D3300 24.2 MP CMOS Digital SLR Camera with Auto Focus-S DX Nikkor 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G VR II Zoom Lens (Black) by Adisorn Wichit ᠌

Before that, I used the d3100 for six months, I compare it with it. Landscapes are subjectively worse, portraits are better. Less like color reproduction. Autofocus often misses, in 3100 I did not notice this. I bought it for test photos from imaging-resource, it seemed that the noise was sorted out in the new model. But it was not there. Noises are depressing at more than 3100. Even at iso 100. (Maybe a purely Japanese copy was tested there, mine was made in Thailand). The stabilizer provides 24MP to the same extent that in the 3100 its kit lens provided 14MP (blurs appear at the same shutter speeds). After 3 months of careful use under normal conditions, a lot of dust stuck to the focusing screen, the largest particle the size of the focus point (the lens was put in the store when checking and was not removed after that). In 3100, under the same conditions, dust did not appear at all in 2.5 years! I'm afraid to think what will happen to the matrix soon . (Perhaps this is a fee for parking the lens - there are no noticeable gaps in the body and lens, it appears when parking, but maybe it's not from there, although it is during parking that the volume of the lens increases the most - I think it sucks into all the cracks!), When the lens is rotated, sometimes something sticks a little, as if something got there. It's not my fault, I'm probably unlucky with the copy, it doesn't affect the quality. Surprised by the built-in flash. At 3100 in the dark, it seems that it was pointless to shoot with it, at 3300 decent pictures are obtained from a short distance. If you're lucky with focusing, you can get great videos, but gigantic in size, so it's doubtful to use it as a video camera. I regret more that I didn’t buy a d3100 with an improved lens for this money.