Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Stanislaw Rogulski ᠌ photo
1 Level
313 Review
0 Karma

Review on πŸ“± 128GB Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge Smartphone by Stanislaw Rogulski ᠌

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I expected mediocre quality, but the product was pleasantly surprised.

In general, a rather controversial and ambiguous model. At such a high price, the device is expected to be almost perfect, and the disappointment from the lack of the usual used functions is great. Built-in wireless charging is perceived rather as exotic, although, probably, someone will appreciate An absolute plus is, of course, a good camera, or rather, the current implementation of the HDR mode and Auto HDR in it. But in terms of price / features, in my opinion, the best option is the Galaxy S5.

Pros
  • Appearance - the impression really makes. 2K resolution display - good colors, lots of information fits (especially noticeable in navigation programs). Camera, both back and front. Pictures even with the front camera are very good, selfie lovers will like it. And Skype video got better (compared with S3/S4/S5). A large amount of internal memory - in fact, the fact that the device does not need to buy a flash drive, I really liked it. Convenient mode "Interview" at the Dictaphone. Fast dual-mode charging. NAVITEL for 1 year as a gift.
Cons
  • The biggest disappointment was the lack of support for DLNA and popular audio and video codecs (such as AC3 and DivX). In general, the "omnivorousness" of SAMSUNG smartphones / tablets regarding video formats has always been one of the most important criteria for me when choosing the company's products. Why in the flagship they "unscrewed" something that has worked perfectly since the time of the Galaxy S3, I personally do not understand at all. From two *. avi files with the following codec combinations (according to VLC Media Player) - MPEG-4 Video (DX50) / A52 Audio (aka AC3) (a52) and MPEG-4 Video (XVID) / A52 Audio (aka AC3) (a52) - S6 Edge did not play any, but S3/S4 and Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 played all. Also disappointing is the return to USB 2.0 instead of USB 3.0 in the Galaxy S5, while there is no MHL support. With a monolithic, non-separable case, there is no protection against moisture, as in S5.