Review on Nikon D810 Full-frame DSLR Camera Body by Vinay Kumar ᠌

I used d7000, 610. Cameras are used in reporting in different conditions, in studio shooting. I take several thousand photos a week, the experience of using it is not small . cons: I will not talk nonsense about a comfortable grip, and other purely subjective things. When buying, I was led to permission and articles about improved autofocus. I’ve been shooting reports on 810 for half a year, and I can say that autofocus practically can’t cope with backlight on any lens. Because exactly in the same conditions - place and light, the same d610 calmly catches right away. At times, autofocus is dull, it does not last long, but it happens - in a beauty studio (imagine lighting) it may refuse to focus . This caused a shock that it is sometimes difficult for him to focus. It is treated by switching the focus not on the central point, it saves the situation. Sometimes he focuses on something and thinks about it. Even shutter priority doesn't help. Further, a terribly poor resolution format in 2 variations - 36 and 9.9 mps! Moreover, 9 mps is some kind of horror, because it does not stretch. This format does not allow you to stretch and use DD to the fullest, unlike 36 mps. How and why this happens is unclear. BB can sometimes walk. frames with a difference per second can noticeably differ in BB. The 610 handled this better. pluses: resolution. Good DD. Holds noise better than 610. There are actually many advantages. But it makes no sense to list them, they are already clear from the characteristics. But the presence of unexpected minuses clearly spoiled the impression. After all, sometimes having 610 on hand, I don’t understand how autofocus can lose so much with 810. Nobody writes about autofocus problems in reviews. After talking in chats, I found out that other colleagues have the same problems and impressions, so you don’t need to think that this is very subjective. To some extent I regret that I did not buy 850.