Review on Smart watch SUUNTO 5, graphite copper by Mateusz Grzesiak  (M ᠌

Both of these are crucial considerations. First, the pedometer on the treadmill is aggressively lying. The clock goes 5 kilometers on a 3-kilometer track. And most crucially, once the clock has ticked, it cannot be undone. When paired, they provide the same inaccurate information to the suunto app and Strava. It's possible to rectify inaccurate data in the Suunto app's log but not on the watch itself, unlike Strava. Hence, the race statistics are as skewed as they can get; I even clocked in at a negative speed! This was a double-flight date. In this case, the epic failure is obvious: it's a watch. When I first open my eyes in the morning, I see that my phone has gained an extra hour. I checked the date and saw that it was December 1st. To be precise, the date was December 4th. ¯\ (ツ) /¯ This may be explained by the fact that the clock was trying to locate GPS signals just before the failure occurred, as part of a workout at the gym (per the Treadmill program) but failing miserably. This was one of my first exercises using the watch, so I didn't know how to preemptively disable the satellite search feature. I think the watch was trying to determine the current date using satellite information, but it was unable to do so and instead settled on a date chosen at random. Why does zhps become the default while playing a track? Mystery. The default dials are either too cluttered with information to be useful, or they don't provide enough information to customize the preset modes properly. Leaving the target heart rate zone does not trigger any kind of warning. You should have one because you are always checking the time when you go for a run. The software is skewed and has mediocre usability; you'll have to get used to it. Data, such as several minutes' worth of heart rate recording, sometimes vanishes during import to Strava. A void in the graph, nothing more.