Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Micha ochowski ᠌ photo
1 Level
353 Review
0 Karma

Review on Thermos 1 liter compact Arktika 105-1000 with two cups by Micha ochowski ᠌

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A good quality product, I rate this purchase perfectly.

Currently, he was pressing the nose buttons of an Arctic 105 and an ancient Thermos ncb-12b. Size: Thermos 1.2 liters, Arctic 1 liter (thus theoretically the Arctic should have a lesser heat capacity). Both were warmed up, and then hot water was poured over them at 23:00. In the Arctic, the head and upper torso heat up quickly (and noticeably so). Thermos has a chilly exterior. Both stayed out in the open all night. At 10 a.m., in Arctic 780's Thermos 770. What happens, happens. Arctic is only two days old whereas the thermos is at least five years old. They have a 4.5-fold difference in cost. Also, after 26 hours, the Arctic temperature is 610 degrees Fahrenheit and 620 degrees Fahrenheit in Thermos. The trial period has ended. I believe the density to be sufficient to justify the acquisition of Arctic territory.

Pros
  • Simple
Cons
  • The flask's cap and top are placed on a heating element.