Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Ewa Kornacka ᠌ photo
1 Level
79 Review
0 Karma

Review on Thermos 1 liter compact Arktika 105-1000 with two cups by Ewa Kornacka ᠌

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I can't stop being happy with the purchase, a very good deal!

At this point, he pushed the foreheads of the Arctic 105 as well as the old Thermos ncb-12b. Thermos holds 1.2 liters of liquid while the Arctic holds only 1 liter (which means that the heat capacity should, in theory, be lower). After bringing both of them to a warm temperature at 23, in the evening, pour boiling water over them. In the Arctic, the upper part of the body as well as the lid begin to warm up right away (and do so in a very noticeable manner). The thermos has a chilly exterior. Both were stored at room temperature for the entire night. At ten o'clock in the morning in Thermos 770, in Arctic 780. I'll keep you updated on how it goes. The thermos is at least five years old and possibly even older, while the Arctic has only been around for two days. The price difference between them is equivalent to 4.5 times the difference. Additional information: after 26 hours, the temperature in the Arctic has reached 610, while in the thermos it has reached 620. The experiment has been completed. I believe that the density is sufficient justification for the acquisition of the Arctic.

Pros
  • Simple
Cons
  • The lid together with the top of the flask are both heated.