Review on 👣 Get Lightweight and Flexible SIMARI Womens Barefoot Walking Gray Women's Shoes for Enhanced Athletic Performance by Tim Beckett

I have been wearing these shoes for 6 weeks now and walk in creeks 4-5 days a week 2-3 hours a day. The Appalachian Mountains in North Carolina are rocky bottom streams. How are they preserved? Honestly about what I expected. The first thing I want to say is that these shoes will most likely tear or fray in the material before ripping the stitching. My main concern was the soles and the connection with the material, but in general it wasn't a problem. Thin fabric is more associated with durability and will wear out quickly with repeated use. But I gave 4 stars. Why? I didn't expect these shoes to last more than one summer. If you need something that will last longer than the price, look elsewhere. But if the price you pay is worth a season of use, I think you'll get it. I tested this shoe while climbing rocky creeks where I sometimes had to slip and rub. So I treated them more severely than the average user is likely to be. things i like. The feel on the feet - they feel comfortable when you first put them on, nice stretchy material which makes them look a little cheap in the packaging as their flexibility and thinness allow them to be sent in a small package. I like feeling mostly barefoot with some rubber outsole protection. You are good at it. In that sense, sizing-size seems to be right. Close-fitting, not loose-fitting, but not tight. Lightweight - almost barefoot heavy. Sole - I like that the sole is big and wraps around the edges a bit. Things I could criticize: Insertion. It has a "small" pad, but after a few weeks your main contact pressure points will flatten this pad and actually make it smaller. If you need a softer cushion when using it, you will need aftermarket inserts. But if you look at water shoes, cushioning probably doesn't matter much. Price versus value - that's what matters, isn't it? I paid $25 and will use it for 3-5 months. Right now they cost me about $1 a day as I've been in the water with them over 25 times, over an hour each time. That's really one of the only reasons for my 4 stars. It's worth it to me, but I've seen the price go up lately. I don't know if it's worth it for €30. May be. 20€ would definitely be better. The trade-off here is that I could spend more on better quality water shoes from Teva, Solomon etc and certainly get more seasons out of them. But getting 3 seasons is 3 times cheaper. I might get 4 for 3 times the price, but still. Everyone has to determine this value for themselves. As for me, will I agree to a new pair next season or try something different. But I could understand the desire to take an old faithful pair out of the closet for another season if someone bought a better product. star for me. Conclusion: I like the feel, the fit, they are suitable for my purposes. Bought. So for me, ie value, they were worth it. Her bad wear after 6 weeks wouldn't have been for anyone else. For the average user, I would expect you to get a season of use with little wear, especially on sandy beaches. If this review helped at all, click this helpful button. It makes me happy to see that something I've taken the time to do has helped people. Reviews are so subjective and hard to navigate.