Review on CASIO G-Shock Wrist Watch by Ingrid Tomanov ᠌
I am satisfied, the product fully corresponds to the description.
. When compared to the W-800 (they look and perform similarly, but the 800 lacks a timer), the battery life is only two years, rather than ten. There is a 2.5 increase in price from the comparable amount of 800. Believe me when I say that WR-20220m are unnecessary. The buttons are a bit larger and easier to press than elsewhere. Disadvantages No timer, 800 plastic glass (flush), and uneven backlight on the screen. The verdict, in my opinion, is a resounding "W800"; purchasing one is money well spent.
- Features include as shock absorption, scratch-free glass, a timer, and pinpoint accuracy. Comfortable, even lighting.
- In contrast, the W-800 model is: The display is a little grainy and the battery is two years old. I didn't realize that pressing the buttons would be so inconvenient (how am I supposed to work with a stopwatch?). Like many watches of its kind, this one will eventually wear out its strap. When compared to many of the company's other models, these are surprisingly slow (perhaps due to random chance, but I checked for two copies before writing this review). These wristwatches are designed for high-risk athletes.
New products
Comments (0)
Top products in ⌚️ Women's Wrist Watches
Another interesting products
CASIO G-Shock GMW-B5000D-1E Wrist Watch, Silver
18 Review
Smart watch HUAWEI Watch GT Sport, black
20 Review
Watch CASIO G-Shock GA-110GB-1A
20 Review
Torbollo Quick Release Watch Bands - Available In Various Colors And Widths (18Mm, 20Mm, 22Mm, Or 24Mm) - High-Quality Nylon Watch Straps With Sturdy Brushed Buckle
16 Review