Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Anastazja Lenarcik ᠌ photo
1 Level
174 Review
0 Karma

Review on Computer headset HyperX Cloud Stinger, black-red by Anastazja Lenarcik ᠌

Revainrating 4 out of 5

It was a reasonable purchase, I will order more.

There was a window of chance to come back, since there was a phone call due to an inappropriate microphone. Yet, as I truly didn't want to give up the sound, I decided to keep it. The benefits of it include: Benefits strictly in terms of how they affect the finances 3.8-4.2. This is an appropriate beginning budget for more or less full-sized ambrashurs at today's costs. There are also additional weight categories available within the 6++ price range; I believe you ought to look into the Sennheiser GSP 300. a tone that is mostly focused on the bass. ears trained specifically for the game. I can assure you that after trying it with a juicy bass, then it's hard to sit back down for a flat sound (Plantronics gamecom 380) - it's no longer desirable:) Despite the fact that they write that these basses are not needed at all for a number of purposes, including music and other subtleties, but for games, despite these claims, having tried it with a juicy bass makes it difficult to sit back down for a flat sound. - long! a wire that is soft and flexible. It is frequently asked why it is so lengthy, but it is unclear why one would purchase such a portable player given that, in general, there is not enough length for the device to be used in a comfortable manner on a stationary computer. - both connections for color and taste through an adapter - either sound and micro are on separate connectors or one connector with four pins - either option can be troublesome in certain circumstances. This is the strategy that applies to everyone, and that's all. It is odd that the majority of manufacturers do not provide this degree of adaptability. - a dial for the volume located on the ear (insanity on the wire - the same as above) I had the intention of deliberatively turning off the microphone by extending the boom. the function is extremely user-friendly; yet, it is perplexing that all of the manufacturers are smarter, but choose not to implement it, capital T comfy. The implementation resulted in incorrect calculations for the various time models. That is the height of insanity to crawl under the table, pull the wire, and seek for some kind of switch on the wire that requires a quick second action. Even though the fit is snug, the ear pads do not press in any way on the cartilage of the ear, despite the fact that the ears themselves are quite large. Definitely one that has comfort. In comparison to velor, the leatherette material is quite functional. It has a velvety feel about it, which is incredibly soothing to the senses. - Place the ear pads down and fold the headset into "tabletop mode." Many disadvantages: - in the position of being closed. In point of fact, you can hear approximately one-half of the sound coming from the outside in them; to put it another way, they muffle the sound. On the other hand, the outside gives the appearance that there is no isolation at all because you can clearly hear the sounds of the surrounding environment. Plantronics gamecom 380 - open ears take in practically everything that is heard from the outside, but they let less of the outside in than other types of ears. Paradox. - nevertheless, a direct and inappropriate deployment of a microphone is the most significant problem with the plan. You can also plug in a preamplifier and other hardware additions, but most people will use it straight out of the box. Later on, many people will disagree with me and point out that amplification is not the most important thing in life. But, due to the terrible amplification, the recording does not contain any audible content. And this is with the boost of +20 db already applied. This microphone is not suitable for streaming at all. With a budget of 1.7-2.0 compared to the Stinger, the Plantronics gamecom 380 just turns out a magnificent micro; at a gain of +10, the recording is three times louder. A brief digression on an unrelated subject: I was successful in doing tests on both the "vintage" ALC892 codec and the brand-new ALC1220 codec. I checked to make sure that all of this was just marketing with "enhanced amplification built-in, now much stronger"; nevertheless, there is no difference in terms of amplification, and you cannot even read about all of its charms in the description of the ALC1220.