Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Afi Hayden ᠌ photo
1 Level
104 Review
11 Karma

Review on Sennheiser HD 200 Professional Monitoring Headphone: Exceptional Audio Performance for Monitoring Purposes by Afi Hayden ᠌

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Nothing special, there are positive and negative sides.

There are not many reviews on YaMarket for this product, so I consider it necessary to write my own. When buying, I liked the packaging, and how the ears are packed in it. However, upon removing the headphones, the room was filled with the smell of plastic. Not bad at all. The plastic itself is not the most expensive to the touch. Yes, nitpicking, you say, but I compare it with my other headphones - SteelSeries Siberia full-size headset v2. The difference in the quality of materials (to the touch again) is simply huge. OK. Headphones are not chosen for high-quality plastic. What is there in terms of sound? And the sound is not clear. I must say right away that the sound in my opinion . is not good. Firstly, the person here, in the comments, wrote about space. However, I want to inform you that in your ears you feel like in a box. You will tell me - "Hey yo, what do you want from closed-type headphones." Well. Maybe. However, "Steels" position themselves as closed-type headphones, but there is much more "air" in the sound. Okay, I would say that the "Steeles" are semi-closed, but not about them now. Let's get back to Senham. The inscription about powerful bottoms proudly flaunts on the box. Well, I agree, after my past headphones there is a lot of bass, but it is unlikely to suit lovers of "swotting". The middle of the Senkhov is quite pleasant, quite detailed. The tops are drawn in unnaturally. This is where you start to hear the barrel. Which is in the box. You just want to lift the top, but then you understand - it won't get any better. You again say - "come on, dude, what source did you listen to." With a resistance of 32 ohms and 108 dB of sensitivity, I think they can be listened to from anything that has an audio jack. Krch, it was an external sound system from Stills, a Mi MIX 2s phone and an integrated sound system on the MSI 970 Gaming board (which can sound good, I assure you of that). All this was seasoned with the previously prepared FLAC. I don’t believe in warming up the ears and I think that the picture will obviously not improve . unless I get used to the sound myself. And so. For 2500 - 3000 it will probably go, for 4200 (and somewhere even 5000) I can’t advise.

Pros
  • + Appearance + Ears look very, very (individually) +Packaging+ You buy cheap ears, and you open the feeling like a premium product (individually) + Landing + They sit hard, but I would not say that this is a minus. The cups completely cover the ears, so there is no discomfort during a long sitting (however, this is individual).
Cons
  • - Probably plastic - *Attention personal, subjective opinion* Sound. I don’t consider myself an audiophile (otherwise I would take ears of this price category? Of course not), but in short - a deep bottom, a detailed middle, a barrel at the top. Metal / Rock immediately in the negative. Electronica/Pop - yes, perhaps, but up to a certain point, namely, until the track focuses on detail, but entertains with bass and mids. Repchik . Perhaps, apparently, he is the only one who feels comfortable here. Oh yes, movies were also not comfortable to listen to.