Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Micha Zikowski ᠌ photo
1 Level
338 Review
0 Karma

Review on Canon EOS 600D Kit EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II, black by Micha Zikowski ᠌

Revainrating 2 out of 5

It is impossible to use, a bad product.

It is preferable to take a secondhand 5d mk1 over a 600d if we compare cameras in the same price range. Comparing ff and crop in the 5d is absurd because the camera has few bells and whistles and the only thing depressing about it is the screen. I purchased a 600-ku with a 50mm f/1.8 lens. Later, I invested in a + L-ku 70-200 f/4 lens. For a while, I was dejected until I entered the ravens into Lightroom and set the ISO to 400 and above. In theory, this worked, but the image turned to flat striped noise with no volume right away. With the exception of the focal point selection, of course, and the fact that there are many settings, everything is spinning, that's probably all there is to the ease of use with the 600d. After suffering for a year, I finally started to regret switching to this system. I barely sold it for $11,000 and decided to try my luck one last time by purchasing a used Canon 5D 2022 for $18,000. the original carrot, to be precise. What else can I say, even at 50 1.8, it fires as before L-ke failed on 600-ke. True, it is outdated, but it has a lot of features and a mediocre display. Yet, I don't have to boast about a camera or evaluate it according to standards in order to take beautiful images. I applied Soviet optics to it via a dandelion, which is often a class. You receive a lot more for the same price in terms of the finished product. If you want to purchase a 600d or another model in order to study, then I advise you to think very carefully about your decision. It would be better to purchase something else for this amount of money, preferably something used and FF. You'll be pleasantly surprised by the outcome, I assure you. It leads me to believe that Canon marketers are cramming some sort of cheap chit-chat behind their budget-friendly models, which has absolutely nothing to do with Canon. Canon begins with FF for me. Ideal for flaunting your status as a "photographer" and demonstrating that you lack a soapbox to girls while wearing around a whale. I was unable to use it further. I strongly warn everyone who wants to capture photos to not do it.

Pros
  • Live view, swivel screen, and camera size. Zoom when manually focusing in life view. The only benefit is the life view, which has a manual focus and a magnification of up to 8x. It's very useful, but the outcome is only soap. The fact that Canon is stylish, for starters. 5-stars on - because the people who bought it didn’t hold anything else in their hands, and if they did, they only held a soap dish, so they compare it with it.
Cons
  • - The image is enhanced by the screen. -The colors fade quickly, and the shadows are awful. (Too many megapixels for such a matrix) -If the ISO is above 400, the image becomes flat and is useless. - The process of choosing AF spots is inconvenient. - On the count, who thought of that?