Review on Helmet VR Lenovo Explorer Windows Mixed Reality Headset by Velizar Chayshev ᠌

Your health, nerves, and wallet will suffer regardless of the helmet you use. today VR and all its peripherals are nothing more than a one-time demo. This option is the most benign. Some pros: Lightweight, the cheapest, after a recent price reduction by Lenovo, and in many respects superior to WMR ogues, a helmet with an audio jack and a visor. Unlike Vive and Oculus, it has only two wires for connection, combined into one (USB + HDMI), and does not require installation, connection and configuration of additional tracking stations. IMPORTANT! WMR has no restrictions on the applications that can be launched, except that you just have to download and install the Oculus client and Revive to complete the picture. All. Its cons: Helmet: Cheap materials; Dead pixel after a week of use; Not the most accurate touchpads and creaking triggers; The gasket quickly gets dirty, it is not subject to washing; The placement of the wires makes it nearly impossible for the visor to work; You can not adjust the interpupillary distance; You will not be able to jump or shake your head sharply in it, the mount is not so stable; Someone may burn out from the need for BT for the controllers to work. WMR: Yes, hands are often lost, which becomes a serious problem in active games; I don't know if Cliff house starts when Oculus or Vive is running, but here it is a MANDATORY condition for the helmet to work. Loading the Cliff house is like the "on" on for a helmet; The helmet is powered even when the Cliff house is closed and it's scary. WMR is still that that needs preparation before each session and maintenance.