Review on Wireless headphones Sony WH-1000XM3, silver by Micha Niemczyk ᠌

After using the M2 model, I changed to the M3. I apologize a little, and here is why. The widespread consensus is that Sony somewhat decreased the cost of production despite a few good advances (Type-C, increased noise isolation, incorporating spectacles. - M1 reminded me of high-end headphones, M2 is already simpler but still usable, and M3 occasionally makes me think of China consumer products. Only the base of the rim, which is not even visible, is made of metal; the rest is constructed of a sturdy, cheap-looking, and occasionally squeaking plastic. - The M2 boasted excellent touch controls that, in 10 out of 10 instances, correctly recognized what you intended to do and operated without a hitch. Ok, if in half here. The track switches if you want the volume to be louder. - The cloth cushions in the cups are fragile, always in contact with the ears, and too close to the ears; as a result, they are sweat- and dirt-absorbing and fit without any tension. - There are interruptions and breaks from time to time. This caught my attention at big malls or in the cities. The pocket next to it contains the phone. maybe a network or device interference. For M2, this was not true. Usually, everything is good at home. The headphones are still nice despite the mentioned flaws. They provide superior noise isolation, long battery life, and sound quality. I advise purchasing them at a significant discount, but converting from M2 or even M1 is not, in my opinion, worthwhile. Both of the earlier models are still excellent. They both have a similar sound.