Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Dagmara Nowicka ᠌ photo
1 Level
67 Review
0 Karma

Review on Thermos 1 liter compact Arktika 105-1000 with two cups by Dagmara Nowicka ᠌

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Best thing I have ever used, highly recommended!

Currently, he was pressing the nose buttons of an Arctic 105 and an ancient Thermos ncb-12b. Thermos holds 1.2 liters, whereas the Arctic holds only 1 liter (thus theoretically, the Arctic should be able to hold less heat). At 23:00, after warming them both, I doused them with boiling water. In the Arctic, the head and upper torso heat up quickly (and noticeably so). Thermos appears icy on the outside. Both stayed out in the open all night. In the Arctic 780 at 10 a.m., in Thermos 770. Let's see how this turns out. Arctic is only two days old whereas the thermos is at least five years old. They have a 4.5-fold difference in cost. Additional information: after 26 hours, the Arctic temperature is 610 and in Thermos it is 620. We can now stop the experiment. I believe the density to be sufficient to justify the acquisition of Arctic territory.

Pros
  • Simple
Cons
  • Both the lid and the top of the flask are warmed.