Overpaying for the appearance, and so it goes, but it's better to look at other models Got pros: The thinness, appearance and saturation of the screen, the backlight of the keyboard, the lightness of the laptop, fast charging, just an hour for a full charge, keeps about 6 hours of active work. Got cons: The price, the dirtiness, you have to constantly wipe it. Everyone praised the memory and speed . but it wasn’t there, I don’t really need memory, but the elementary speed, when you sit on the Internet with many tabs, let us down, it was also very disappointing, which is very weak pulls games, even very simple ones. Before that, there was a laptop cheaper than 15k, also light, compact, it was enough to surf the internet, and so, this laptop is not far gone Definitely an overpayment for the screen, weight and appearance. If for you 300-400 grams of weight do not matter, then it is better to take a laptop for 30 thousand, so as not to overpay, but it will be no worse than that. In addition, the quality of 4K on YouTube does not always pull, the picture becomes ribbed
Fast charger COMMO 65W Multi Charger Dual USB-C + USB-A, GaN, 65 W, COMMO Gray
39 Review
Wi-Fi router ASUS RT-AC66U, black
107 Review
Wi-Fi router ASUS RT-AC88U, black/red
41 Review
Dell XPS 15 & Precision M3800 Genuine 130W Slim Power AC Adapter - High-Quality Charger for 9530, 9550, 9560, 9570, 5510, 5520, 5530 Laptops (HA130PM130/DA130PM130)
13 Review