Review on Smartphone Samsung Galaxy A50 4/64 GB, 2 SIM, black by Jnis Zari ᠌

Name: Smartphone Samsung Galaxy A50 4/64 GB, 2 SIM, black
Item: Smartphone Samsung Galaxy A50 4/64 GB, 2 SIM, black
Rating: 4

July 04, 2023

Not a bad purchase, worth the money.

In general, the phone is good in terms of price / quality ratio. If you do not want to take China, and you need a good "brand" phone for a limited amount of money - a good choice.

But. It should be borne in mind that despite the fact that this is samsung, this is far from being a flagship, but rather a weak, budget model. Although all the "software" chips of the older brother are present here - this is a state employee.

Among compeors, IMHO, the most suitable, despite the listed shortcomings.

If you choose between Honor 8x, I will choose A50. Between P30L and Samsung - chose A50.

There is one interesting model - xiaomi redmi note 7. I felt and looked. The screen, of course, is worse, but it also costs 4 cheaper. It is more beautiful, stronger, in general, it wins in terms of price and quality.
The only downside is no nfc. This is the reason why samsung was chosen. If he was in Xiao, he would not even look at the Samsung.

So, if you need a state employee, and do not need nfc, take the "seven". If not, you can not bother with the choice, and feel free to take this device.

P. S with a constantly working network, several photos, 10 minutes of talks, and 4 hours of browsing the cart (including videos, photos), 2 hours of listening to music - enough for 14 hours.
The need does not quite satisfy . I would like more (The older brother A70, for example, has 500 more).

Before that, there was Xiao note 4x - I forgot about charging at all). Under the same regime, at the end of the day there were still 40 percent left.

But there is fast charging, which, in principle, can compensate for this. Crutch, of course, but .

p. P. s In terms of price-quality, in principle, it is good, but . Here is this "BUT" . Something is wrong in it, and I cannot projectively explain what. Something is wrong, somehow it doesn’t work like that, there’s a jamb, there’s a jamb, they did it cheaper here . You don’t expect this from Samsung.

Samsung is an "A" brand with a capital letter. But here . Subjectively, it is really less pleasant than xiao not 7.

Probably, I would recommend this smart all the same . Probably .

Pros

1. The first and most important thing that influenced the essment is the Price. Further, all the "pros" and "cons" were taken into account based on the price of the device, namely 16k. 2. Bright, rich screen. 3. Sufficiently capacious battery, quite pulling a day of work. 4. Durable. I have already checked. 5. Despite the presence of Type-C, AUX was not removed. 6. NFC 7. The work is smooth, no critical errors, no freezes were found. The firmware is raw, but more on that below. 8. There is a fast charge, which can sometimes save.

Cons

1. PWM at low light level. Potentially it harms the eyes, health. I got a device with the latest firmware, it is almost invisible. Only if you look closely. In the previous - vyrviglaz simply. 2. RAW, frankly RAW firmware, with many flaws. It feels like I bought Xiaomi. Very surprised by the policy of Samsung in this regard. Although it is understandable, China has devoured the market, it is necessary to catch up as soon as possible, at any cost. If more specifically, then: the most infuriating - periodically the phone does not change orientation. It will set, for example, horizontal, and does not return to vertical. Only after blocking-unblocking will change. You stand like a fool and wait for it to roll over . It's even funny. The on-screen print is also "something", more on that later. 3. Camera. Frankly . It seems like there are 3 of them, but in fact - not a single normal one. It shoots at the level of Honor 8x, sometimes better, sometimes worse. If you turn off all the "software" improvements to the stock firmware - Honor is better. In general - ugh, the level of Dishman xiao. 4. Screen print. Well, it's just ugliness. Slow, imprecise work. Sometimes it works right away, sometimes it gets stupid for 2 seconds, and it cannot recognize the same finger. In this case, the difference in cases is 5 seconds. Frankly crude, inconvenient technology. What's on the ten, what's on this. I don't understand how this can be put on the market. 5. Only three colors. Dirty black, cheap blue, and more or less adequate white. Look at Xiao 7. Beautiful phone, looks very cool. Why "A" brand released this is a mystery. 6. Very. WELL, VERY fat firmware. It just takes up a lot of space. On the old mobile, all the software + bare bucket weighed less than the current firmware from Samsung. 7. The phone is relatively young, there are very few custom firmwares. Yes, and not the fact that they will appear later. 8. Feels very cheap and "weak" plastic (although it seems like gl). I wear a phone in gl and a case, but the overall impression still spoils.