Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Anuson Rachso ᠌ photo
1 Level
121 Review
69 Karma

Review on 🎧 SAMSUNG Galaxy Buds+ Plus, True Wireless Earbuds with Enhanced Battery Life and Call Clarity (Includes Wireless Charging Case) - International Version, White (Galaxy Buds Plus 2020) by Anuson Rachso ᠌

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Not a bad product, but I expected a little more.

I made the decision to purchase these headphones for myself after reading a significant number of reviews that praised them; however, I deeply regret having done so. I don't mean to be offensive, but the only individuals who could possibly enjoy the sound coming from these headphones are those who are entirely deaf. Even though I am aware that it is difficult to expect a more qualified assessment of the sound quality of audio equipment in the present climate, which is characterized by the insane degradation of musical taste, I wanted to hear for that kind of money at least half of the playback advantages that I read about. Many people believe that the quality of these headphones can only be really appreciated when they are paired with a Samsung smartphone. Having firsthand experience with the flagship model of this company's smartphone lineup, it is unsettling to contemplate the type of noise that might be emitted by other mobile devices. I attempted to configure and play through a variety of applications, but there was essentially no discernible change. Prior to that, there were wireless headphones from Baseus that cost $20. These headphones had a significantly improved sound quality, and the contrast was readily apparent. There is a significant difference in quality between these headphones and, for instance, the in-ear wireless headphones sold by Sony for two hundred dollars.

Pros
  • 1. Outward presentation 2. Autonomy. 3. Pleasant to the touch in terms of the sensation experienced when it is placed in the ear 3. The capabilities of the software used in a proprietary application
Cons
  • 1. High frequencies that are oversaturated and rattling. 2. Removed or "killed" low frequencies, which, given the nature of the composition, ought to have been heard more prominently. 3. Flat middle. 4. No moisture protection (not important for me). 5. Mediocre passive noise isolation (carefully selected suitable ear pads for my ears). 6. The function that amplifies the background sound does its job, but it is largely unnecessary because the sounds of the environment can be picked up quite clearly even without it. In addition, when you enable this option, it is not very comfortable to hear your own speech because there is a slight delay in the sound that is barely detectable. The sound of music in general has a crumpled, ringing tone, and its quality is comparable to that of headphones that cost ten dollars. Never anticipated seeing something like this from a market-leading brand.