Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Amit Amit ᠌ photo
1 Level
131 Review
56 Karma

Review on Canon EOS 6D Wi-Fi Enabled Digital SLR Camera (Body Only) with 20.2 MP CMOS Sensor and 3.0-Inch LCD by Amit Amit ᠌

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The price/quality ratio is great, I will buy again.

I'll write everything as detailed as possible, maybe I took it myself, I took white in the first days of September. There are very few reviews from those who really used it in their work, and forum non-critics go through the forest. Let's start with why I chose it. Sony is insanely cool as a given picture, but their autonomy is trembling. The prices for normal lenses that can be used in a report are simply cosmic, and there are few of them on the used market. *For me personally, this is an electronic viewfinder. Nikon, well, to each his own, their trick is DD) and here, for sure, many Nikons are better than the new 6ki in this regard. Don't like their color. the direct competitor is the D750, I liked Canon more, focusing, color, lenses, dual pixel and a very convenient screen outweighed Nikonov with their dd, 4K and slots. Well, it’s just more pleasant for no particular reason when shooting. Fuji, mirrorless crop is not attractive, expensive lenses are too small for me. I don’t know Pentax at all, I didn’t use it, my friends don’t have it. I didn’t particularly consider it, although they write that their cameras are good. That's how I settled on Canon, I wasn’t particularly attached to the optics park, it’s not difficult to sell a couple of lenses. And now it's going to be hard to get off of him) As I wrote above, I compared it with Mark 3, it has 2 slots, autofocus points take up more space in the frame, there is a headphone output, a little larger and heavier, the same long-lived Fives shutter. The 6DM2 has more megapixels, faster autofocus, a swivel touch screen, dual pixel. The last 6d showed itself well. In the report, the second mark shows itself much faster than the first, and there are more details in 6DM2. Autofocus points close to the center do not scare, you can always crop if you feel like it so that the object is completely to the side. there is also a LiveView and you can focus on touch. If you wish, you can record a 1080p video at 60fps, the quality is decent. If you take it for video, it’s better to look at other models from other brands. I am satisfied with the purchase, I look forward to its long service in my hands.

Pros
  • -Convenience, the overall feeling after use is only positive. -Working autofocus, -Ergonomics, -Large selection of lenses, both new and used. -Battery is holding up well -The rotary touch screen is simply gorgeous), after it it's not so convenient at 5k. -Good work at high ISO. -Good build. Dualpixel is great. The menu is clear and everything is within easy reach. In general, a solid second 6k, but for so many years they could have added more. I have been using it since the beginning of September, so far I like it.
Cons
  • -DD. comparable with 5d mark 3, pushed them head-on, in different situations somewhere better 3 marks, somewhere 6dm2 and then the difference is minimal (a couple of percent). With 6dm2 I liked the picture much more often. In general, you need to work on the frame so that there are no powerful dips in the shadows. If there is no time, then it forgives 2 or 3 steps. and I probably won’t write about the fact that I’m shooting at some kind of transcendental ISO and complaining about it, and it’s clear. ISO calmly raises up to 3200. At the ISO itself, it stands up to 3200 when reporting on a car. You can raise it higher, but this is a completely different story in other situations) The result - DD is in order, they inflated the problem due to the fact that they expected more for so many years and a completely new matrix. -1 slot for sd, I had to take several 16GB cards for it, so that in case of data loss from one card, not to lose everything from the shooting. - No 4K video, not critical, if I shoot it only in Full hd. Rendering 4k is not a frail task for a PC. Is that from 4k to full hd and the quality will increase. But if there is a time-lapse in 4k, then why not add it to the video, it certainly won’t be superfluous. - The SD slot, or rather its stub, does not feel very reliable. - AF points close to center "-".98% viewfinder coverage, 2% is not critical at all. - 1/4000 shutter speed, but I would like 1/8000, you rarely use it, but when there is something calmer *I had to install a brand new photoshop with the latest Cam Raw and ate the lightroom. Capture one does not see RAW from it. New camera - new software

Similar reviews