Ufff, finally he arrived. I sold my D3000 double kit (he really limited me with his noise, there are no other complaints), borrowed, added, bought a D7000 + AF50mm 1.8D for growth, so to speak. The first impression is a shock, there are 2 times more buttons, as many as 4 control dials - I sit and understand that I donβt understand anything. The first conclusion is to read the manual, do not buy as the first DSLR (because there is a chance to regret the thousand bucks spent). I put fifty dollars (non-motorized, the cheapest fix of nikkors), aperture priority mode, in the room in the late afternoon behind closed blinds - the first frames, viewing, delight - iso 640 - 800 - and you still need to look for noise in the photo! The second conclusion is that it is worth buying only because of the perfect matrix, BUT for beginners, read the first conclusion and look closely at the D5100 (it has the same matrix). I got used to the controls quickly, everything is logical and convenient, BUT you need to know exactly how your actions will affect the photography process. The third conclusion is to buy only if you are going to develop in a photo, otherwise we read conclusion 2. What is the result? A camera for an advanced amateur (if you will allow a novice pro). As a first camera - a very dubious purchase, but for an upgrade, from old cameras (especially screwdrivers) with a decent fleet of non-motorized optics, the option is very good . By the way, the issue of optics for this camera is not as simple as it seems at first glance. Compared to my D3000, the D7000 is a completely different level that I, as a camera operator, have yet to reach.
Revamped Sony Alpha a6000 Mirrorless Digital Camera: 24.3MP SLR Camera with 3.0-Inch LCD and Power Zoom Lens
103 Review
Canon EOS 60D: 18MP CMOS Digital SLR Camera Body - Your Next Photography Companion
125 Review
Nikon D3100 DSLR Camera Body (Kit Box) - No Lens Included, International Version with No Warranty
298 Review
Nikon D5100 Digital SLR Camera with 18-55mm VR Lens - High Resolution 16.2MP
172 Review