Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Sirirat Benjakalyani ᠌ photo
Bangkok
1 Level
124 Review
112 Karma

Review on Headphones 1MORE Triple Driver In-Ear E1001, black/silver by Sirirat Benjakalyani ᠌

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Not a bad purchase, worth the money.

So, let's talk about how it sounds. I tested it on a smartphone (a Sony Z1) and on the sound system that comes built-in to a personal computer (the sound quality on the PC is lower than on the Sony, so I don't take it into account). As soon as the AP100 arrives, I may add to the review. in comparison to the Sehnheiser HD449 headphones. Because I am not at all an audiophile and I cannot tell the difference between an mp3 and a flask on any composition, you should not anticipate any type of highly-professional sound analysis from me here. I listen to electronic music 90% of the time, classical music 10% of the time, and a little bit of everything else 10% of the time. Negative aspects and contentious issues: 1. Bass. There are a lot of them. Following the senses - too much, on some tracks where the bass dominates - it sounds fantastic, the bass is pretty sharp, legible, does not mix together, and does not interrupt. BUT. This begins to be a problem on tracks where the bass is not the primary component (tracks with vocals, oldies reworked with current processing, and even melodic drum and bass), since this starts to get in the way. Everything else is disrupted by the bass, and in some spots there is even a rumbling. There is a good chance that this and the other recordings are processed with an equalization; however, I have not yet tried it and do not intend to do so at this time (I never used it on senkhs). 2. In a few of the songs that feature male vocals, such as "Maksim," this particular male vocal has a strange sound to it; I'm not sure if it is softer or something else entirely, or if it was somehow edited down. 3. The female vocals are something to behold =) As if I were watching anime, extremely "Chinese" voices, particularly if the voice is pitched high. 4. It seems as though anywhere in the middle it hides a little bit, and the lower portion of the midrange sometimes differs quite badly from the upper part of the midrange, which is where I used to hear an accent on it; can you guess where the accent is now? a bass, without a doubt) Pros: 1. More detail at the very highest levels of the mids and highs. There are generally, generally, generally more details present everywhere (I compare with HD449). 2. The volume is increased, and there is a greater sense of "immersion" in the music. 3. My ears don't hurt (precisely from the sound), I don't know why, but on the HD449 I couldn't listen to some tracks for more than a half an hour at an identical volume, but here everything is fine. My guess is that the HD449 has a more sensitive volume control than this one does. 4. Again, beautiful juicy bass. It ought to go down well with fans. In overall, it's not too bad; it's adequate for use as a portable while traveling, which is why I purchased it. Since my Senkhs cost almost the same, I anticipated that they would produce a sound quality that was comparable. Wrong.

Pros
  • The sound is loud (any phone or player will shake them), there is a headset (anyone likes it, I don't really need it), and there is decent sound insulation. There is a gorgeous box that is manufactured "perfectly," the headphones do not fall out of the ears, and there is rich equipment.
Cons
  • The microphone effect, particularly noticeable when there is no music playing in the background; yet, it does not hinder while music is playing. The wire has a propensity to become tangled, to curl, and eventually there will be "hernias" with the passage of time (there were already headphones with a similar cable)

Similar reviews