Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Micha Dobrzyski ᠌ photo
1 Level
319 Review
0 Karma

Review on MICHELIN Pilot Sport 4 235/45 R17 97Y summer by Micha Dobrzyski ᠌

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Expectations were not met, average quality.

The tire turned out to be quite average, and it deserves a score of 4 out of 5. Good, but not much more than that. It does, in fact, slow down, but it does not whistle when it spins, and it does not float particularly well in the water; all of this, however, occurs without a spark. When I made the transition from Hankook tires to Michelin latitude Sport 3 tires on my Cayenne, I couldn't believe how much different the car felt. I didn't feel almost anything when I got on the PS4 on the X3 F25 from the same Hankuk after I had been there. If that size were available, I'd put my money on the BMW Michelin latitude Sport 3, but unfortunately it's not. I'm going to contrast the Michelin Latitude Sport 3 and the PlayStation 4 because I've spent a lot of time with both of them, and the PS4 comes out on top in every category. In general, each and every one. However, it is important to discuss the wear resistance of the tires separately: after two seasons of racing on the F25, the rear wheels of the PS4 turned into slicks because they were worn down below the limiter. This is something that cannot be tolerated at the conclusion of the season when it is wet outside. On the other hand, the Latitude Sport 3 on a car with twice the power, greater weight, and a driver who was half the age of the owner of the BMW was worn down over the same period of time to the state of "enough for one more season." As a result, I think this rubber is subpar and not worth the money that they ask for it. As soon as it is entirely worn out, I will replace it with a Kontik.

Pros
  • Given that this is a Michelin product, one could think that everything is crystal obvious; yet, NO
Cons
  • descending: Endurance, pricing, mediocre performance