Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Adam Kowalski ᠌ photo
1 Level
349 Review
0 Karma

Review on Wrist watch CASIO Edifice EF-125D-1A quartz, waterproof, illuminated hands by Adam Kowalski ᠌

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A very high-quality product, I take it not for the first time.

Before that, I had a titanium mechanical Citizen with automatic winding that I worn for 17 (seventeen!) years (the watch, by the way, still works perfectly and doesn't have any scratches; it's only that my son gave me a CASIO for his first award). After titanium and mechanics, there is a discernible change in weight (it is heavier), as well as a discernible change in accuracy (it is, after all, quartz that offers greater precision). Take it without question if you are in the market for a watch in the style of a man that is both functional and attractive and costs around $2,022. Pay alert, owners of a little wrist: Casio watches with titanium cases are not only substantially lighter and more compact than their stainless steel counterparts, but they also do not scratch at all, despite the fact that their retail price is slightly higher. Happy shopping!

Pros
  • They have a very beautiful corrugated dial, they are pretty conveniently positioned on the hand, a reliable bracelet, and a latch; however, over the course of six months, they were off by only ten seconds. They have a strict and fashionable appearance. If the advertisement is accurate - 10 years without having to replace the battery, then my goal is that this will be the case. You only need an awl and some little pliers to shorten the length of the bracelet on both sides when you're working on it at home. The locks (cotter pins) of the removable links only need to be slid sideways through the existing oval hole with an awl. After that, they need to be pulled out, the extra link needs to be removed, and then the cotter pin needs to be placed into its proper position. Who's hands grow in the right direction - the complete procedure takes only five minutes.
Cons
  • These are rather remarks, not deficiencies in the argument. The watch is pretty enormous and quite massive, as one of the other users has previously said in their post. Because of the stops, a small radius cannot be accommodated by the bracelet when worn on a wrist that is quite thin. Aside from that, there are no other deficiencies.