Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Abhey Bar ᠌ photo
1 Level
105 Review
65 Karma

Review on Canon PowerShot A3300 IS camera, silver by Abhey Bar ᠌

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Money to nowhere, poor quality of the goods.

in the fall of 2022, a Canon PowerShot A590 was stolen, which was excellent in all photo parameters. I was looking for an analog. Alas, I did not find it. Compared Canon PowerShot A3300 with 3100 - 3100 almost the same crap, only less "bonus" garbage. It would be better then to take 3100 - at least I would save money. And I don’t need video at all (I have a professional camera for this) For comparison, the Canon PowerShot SX200 is even worse - it also has problems with color reproduction ( Well, why does Canon increase pixelation with such a matrix - is it definitely more noise? The 590th had 8 Mpc and it was wonderful, but here 16 and a little better than a phone (. Even if you programmatically configure "this", poking around in the settings every time, then why then such a "soap box", the main function of which is "small size , fast preparation and an unsmeared shot. "The A3300 responds rather weakly to all this. Although it is possible that people who are used to taking photos from their phones will be fine with this. An analogue (without video recording) can be found much cheaper than 5 Of course, it is useless to argue - why is there a camera in the phone, and video in the camera. But it has always been known - the more multifunctional device, the less reliable it is. I took it to "Enabled" - they refused to change it to a more expensive model - now I don't know how to turn it off (

Pros
  • good color reproduction with flash
Cons
  • Sooo much noise and lack of clarity (compared to the Canon PowerShot A590). That is, the pictures are not "blurred", but if you managed to remove the street entrance of the house with ads from 10 meters away, then you will not see what is written there, i. E. if you shoot a panorama, then the leaves and grass just mix into a homogeneous mass