I strongly recommend it to both beginner photographers (they will figure it out, the camera is conducive to learning), and advanced amateurs. Incl. sometimes performing professional tasks. We can definitely say that the Rico-Pentax camera was a success after a number of inexpressive cameras in the amateur K-70 segment - a real breakthrough. Has pros: 1. The most important thing is the highest image quality. The picture is at the level of the best APS format cameras. 2. The Pentax policy itself - with the camera you can use all lenses with K, KA, KA2 mounts, etc., which were produced by Petax or for Pentax. Moreover, all the functionality inherent in these lenses is preserved. 3. The ability to use high ISOs without a significant loss of image quality and exorbitant ISOs with compromised quality. In this parameter, the K-70 is not inferior to the more expensive K-3-II and KR from Pentax, and cameras from other manufacturers are clearly superior. 4. Powerful stabilizer. Moreover, the stabilizer in the camera makes any lens stabilized, including ancient threaded ones. 5. 24 MPs. 6. For beginners - a large selection of custom programs. 7. Extremely low price for such a decent camera. 8. HDR and Pixel Shift functions. Used infrequently, but in difficult times help out. For such a price range, this is just a gift. Some cons: All expectations were met. Because when buying, I knew what I was taking. There are, perhaps, two things missing: the top screen (I'm used to it on the K10D) and the battery could be more powerful. All this is on K-3-II, but I don’t want to spend another 20 thousand on such trifles.
Nikon D5100 Digital SLR Camera with 18-55mm VR Lens - High Resolution 16.2MP
172 Review
Revamped Sony Alpha a6000 Mirrorless Digital Camera: 24.3MP SLR Camera with 3.0-Inch LCD and Power Zoom Lens
103 Review
Canon PowerShot A480 camera, black
108 Review
Nikon COOLPIX L810 Digital Camera: 16.1MP, 26x Zoom, NIKKOR ED Glass Lens, 3-inch LCD (Blue)
95 Review